(1940-1950) (1940sa)(1930-1940)(1950-1960)(1940)(1950) Table of Contents

 

 

 

Sources

 

 

Julian Aberbach, 95; Co-Founded Firm That Published Elvis Hits, Los Angeles Times, 25 May 2004, B11, 1940s See Text

Fred E. Basten Santa Monica Bay: The First 100 Years, A pictorial history of Santa Monica, Venice, Ocean Park, Pacific Palisades, Topanga and Malibu, Douglas-West Publishers: Los Angeles, CA, 1974, 227 pp., 1950s, 1941,   See Text

John Cage An Autobiographical Statement, Southwest Review, 1991, 1940s, See Text

Donald M. Cleland A History of the Santa Monica Schools 1876-1951, Santa Monica Unified School District, February 1952 (Copied for the Santa Monica Library, July 22, 1963). 140 pp., 1952, 1950s, 1940s  See Text

J. J. O'Connor and E. F. Robertson George Dantzig* Biographies of Mathematicians http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Mathematicians/Dantzig_George.html 2005, 1952, 1940s See Text

Pat Hartman Spade Cooley Virtual Venice http://www.virtualvenice.info 2/5/2005b, 1940s See Text

Jim Heimann Sins of the City: The Real Los Angeles Noir, Chronicle Books: San Francisco, CA, 1999, 159pp., 1940s  See Text

Joseph Giovannini Oral History of Esther McCoy Archives of American Art, 1987, 1940s See Text

Mark E. Kann Middle Class Radicalism in Santa Monica, Temple University Press: Philadelphia, 1986. 322pp., 1940s. 1930s  See Text

Paul J. Karlstrom and Susan Ehrlich Turning the Tide: Early Los Angeles Modernists 1920-1956, Barry M. Heisler Introduction Santa Barbara Museum of Art 1990, 1940s   See Text

Kay Kyser and his Orchestra Fun with the Ol' Professor '44-'47, Sony (A-70229), Col-cd-7575 2003, 1947, 1940s Discography See Text

Roger W. Lotchin The Bad City in the Good War, Indiana U. Press: 304 pages. Reviewed in the 17 August 2003 Sunday LA Times Book Review by Jonathan Kirsch, R2, 2003, 1960s 1943, 1940s  See Text

James W. Lunsford The Ocean and the Sunset, The Hills and the Clouds: Looking at Santa Monica, illustrated by Alice N. Lunsford, 1983, 1940s, 1930s   See Text

Eric Mankin Strategies: You Can Win City Hall, Mother Jones, VI, no. X, December, 1981. p. 66. 1981, 1970s, 1950s, 1940s   See Text

Tom Moran and Tom Sewell Fantasy by the Sea Peace Press: Culver City, CA, 1980 (1979) (Originally published by Beyond Baroque Foundation with a grant from the Visual Arts Program of the National Endowment for the Arts), 1940s See Text

Jenny Pirie,* Peter Kastner* and Jeff Mudrick* A Short History of Ocean Park, Ocean Park Community Organization, 1982, (With a 1983 update.) 15pp. 1983, 1982, 1940s, 1926,    See Text

Cecilia Rasmussen, L..A. Then and Now : A 'Carny Kid' Tells Students How He Beat the Odds, Los Angeles Times, May 1, 2005, B2. 1940s  See Text

Lionel Rolfe Literary L.A., Chronicle Books: San Francisco, 1981, 102pp., 1950s, 1941, 1940s, 1908 See Text

Andrea Schulte-Peevers and David Peevers Los Angeles, Lonely Planet: Oakland, 2nd ed., 1996(1999), 351pp., 1999, 1996, 1950s. 1940s. 1920s,   See Text

Jeffrey Stanton Santa Monica Pier A History from 1875 to 1990, Donahue Publishing: Los Angeles, CA, 1990, 1940s  See Text

Jeffrey Stanton Venice of America: 'Coney Island of the Pacific,' Donahue Publishing: Los Angeles, CA, 1987. 176 pp., 1950, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1943, 1941  See Text

Kevin Starr Embattled Dreams California in War and Peace 1940-1950, Oxford University Press Oxford, U.K., 2002, 386 pp., 2002, 1940, 1912, See Text

Les Storrs Santa Monica Portrait of a City Yesterday and Today, Santa Monica Bank: Santa Monica, CA, 1974, 67 pp., 1940s  See Text

Betty Lou Young Our First Century: The Los Angeles Athletic Club 1880-1980, LAAC Press: Los Angeles, California 1979, 176pp., 1940s  See Text

Betty Lou Young and Randy Young Santa Monica Canyon: A Walk Through History Casa Vieja Press: Pacific Palisades, CA, 1997, 182pp., 1940s See Text

 

 

Notes:

     "Everything seems to depend on the whim or law of chance, accidental judgement by accidental authority and forced cause. And by chance and accident we live or die. To reflect this I attempt a personal intuitive expression." [early 1940s]

     [In the early 1950s] "I am seeking art, perhaps, only to realize that it does not exist in itself. It exists only in the abstract, in different individuals' perceptions. Such perceptions must be deeply experienced and lived by, to keep it alive in its ever-changing flux, idea, belief, perception-all is flux . . ." -Knud Merrild, quoted in Karlstrom and Ehrlich, 1990  See Text

 

 

 

Documents

 

 

Julian Aberbach, 95; Co-Founded Firm That Published Elvis Hits, Los Angeles Times, 25 May 2004, B11, 1940s

     "Julian J. Aberbach, 95, who with his brother, Joachim, founded Hill and Range, a music publishing company that published such familiar tunes as Frosty the Snowman, Save the Last Dance for Me, I Walk the Line, and many of Elvis Presley's hits, died May 17 of heart failure at Mount Sinai Hospital in Manhattan.

     "Born in Vienna, Aberbach was living in Paris and trying to start a music publishing company but fled to the United States as World War II approached in Europe.

     "He served in the U.S. Army and developed a love of country music during basic training in the South. After the war, he moved to Los Angeles and went into business.

     "He signed a deal with fiddle player Spade Cooley* to represent Cooley's song Shame on You. The song was issued as a single by Columbia Records and hit No. 1 on the country charts. Aberbach's music business was on its way."

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Fred E. Basten Santa Monica Bay: The First 100 Years, A pictorial history of Santa Monica, Venice, Ocean Park, Pacific Palisades, Topanga and Malibu, Douglas-West Publishers: Los Angeles, CA, 1974, 227 pp., 1950s, 1941,

    On page 178 a photo shot from off the end of the Santa Monica Pier showing surfers, dated 1941, and showing the Monica Hotel (formerly the Breakers Club), the Kabat-Kaiser Institute (formerly the Edgewater Club-demolished in the '50s), and the then Del Mar Club (now Synanon).

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

John Cage An Autobiographical Statement, Southwest Review, 1991, 1940s

      "I joined the faculty of Moholy Nagy's School of Design in Chicago. While there I was commissioned to write a sound effects music for a CBS Columbia Workshop Play. I was told by the sound effects engineer that anything I could imagine was possible. What I wrote, however, was impractical and too expensive; the work had to be rewritten for percussion orchestra, copied, and rehearsed in the few remaining days and nights before its broadcast. That was The City Wears a Slouch Hat by Kenneth Patchen. The response was enthusiastic in the West and Middle West. Xenia and I came to New York, but the response in the East had been less than enthusiastic. We had met Max Ernst in Chicago. We were staying with him and Peggy Guggenheim. We were penniless. No job was given to me for my composing of radio sound effects, which I had proposed. I began writing again for modern dancers and doing library research work for my father who was then with Mother in New Jersey. About this time I met my first virtuosi: Robert Fizdale and Arthur Gold. I wrote two large works for two prepared pianos. The criticism by Virgil Thomson was very favorable, both for their performance and for my composition. But there were only fifty people in the audience. I lost a great deal of money that I didn't have. I was obliged to beg for it, by letter and personally. I continued each year, however, to organize and present one or two programs of chamber music and one or two programs of Merce Cunningham's choreography and dancing. And to make tours with him throughout the United States.

     ". . . Whatever it is it gives me delight and most recently by means of Stephen Addiss' book The Art of Zen. I had the good fortune to attend Daisetz Suzuki's classes in the philosophy of Zen Buddhism at Columbia University in the late forties. And I visited him twice in Japan. I have never practiced sitting cross-legged nor do I meditate. My work is what I do and always involves writing materials, chairs, and tables. Before I get to it, I do some exercises for my back and I water the plants, of which I have around two hundred."

 

John Cage An Autobiographical Statement, Southwest Review, 1991, 1940s

      "In the late forties I found out by experiment (I went into the anechoic chamber at Harvard University) that silence is not acoustic. It is a change of mind, a turning around. I devoted my music to it. My work became an exploration of non-intention. To carry it out faithfully I have developed a complicated composing means using I Ching chance operations, making my responsibility that of asking questions instead of making choices.

     "The Buddhist texts to which I often return are the Huang-Po Doctrine of Universal Mind (in Chu Ch'an's first translation, published by the London Buddhist Society in 1947), Neti Neti by L. C. Beckett of which (as I say in the introduction to my Norton Lectures at Harvard) my life could be described as an illustration, and the Ten Oxherding Pictures (in the version that ends with the return to the village bearing gifts of a smiling and somewhat heavy monk, one who had experienced Nothingness). Apart from Buddhism and earlier I had read the Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna. Ramakrishna it was who said all religions are the same, like a lake to which people who are thirsty come from different directions, calling its water by different names. Furthermore this water has many different tastes. The taste of Zen for me comes from the admixture of humor, intransigence, and detachment. It makes me think of Marcel Duchamp, though for him we would have to add the erotic.

      "As part of the source material for my Norton lectures at Harvard I thought of Buddhist texts. I remembered hearing of an Indian philosopher who was very uncompromising. I asked Dick Higgins, "Who is the Malevich of Buddhist philosophy?" He laughed. Reading Emptiness-a Study in Religious Meaning by Frederick J. Streng, I found out. He is Nagarjuna.

      "But since I finished writing the lectures before I found out, I included, instead of Nagarjuna, Ludwig Wittgenstein, the corpus, subjected to chance operations. And there is another good book, Wittgenstein and Buddhism, by Chris Gudmunsen, which I shall be reading off and on into the future.

      "My music now makes use of time-brackets, sometimes flexible, sometimes not. There are no scores, no fixed relation of parts. Sometimes the parts are fully written out, sometimes not. The title of my Norton lectures is a reference to a brought-up-to-date version of Compositions in Retrospect:

 MethodStructureIntentionDisciplineNotationIndeterminacy
InterpenetrationImitationDevotionCircumstancesVariableStructure
NonunderstandingContingencyInconsistencyPerformance(I-VI).

 When it is published, for commercial convenience, it will just be called IVI ."

     " . . ."

      "I found in the largely German community at Black Mountain College a lack of experience of the music of Erik Satie. Therefore, teaching there one summer and having no pupils, I arranged a festival of Satie's music, half-hour after-dinner concerts with introductory remarks. And in the center of the festival I placed a lecture that opposed Satie and Beethoven and found that Satie, not Beethoven, was right. Buckminster Fuller was the Baron Méduse in a performance of Satie's Le Piège de Méduse. That summer Fuller put up his first dome, which immediately collapsed. He was delighted. "I only learn what to do when I have failures." His remark made me think of Dad. That is what Dad would have said.

      "It was at Black Mountain College that I made what is sometimes said to be the first happening. The audience was seated in four isometric triangular sections, the apexes of which touched a small square performance area that they faced and that led through the aisles between them to the large performance area that surrounded them. Disparate activities, dancing by Merce Cunningham, the exhibition of paintings and the playing of a Victrola by Robert Rauschenberg, the reading of his poetry by Charles Olsen or hers by M. C. Richards from the top of a ladder outside the audience, the piano playing of David Tudor, my own reading of a lecture that included silences from the top of another ladder outside the audience, all took place within chance-determined periods of time within the over-all time of my lecture. It was later that summer that I was delighted to find in America's first synagogue in Newport, Rhode Island, that the congregation was seated in the same way, facing itself.

      "From Rhode Island I went on to Cambridge and in the anechoic chamber at Harvard University heard that silence was not the absence of sound but was the unintended operation of my nervous system and the circulation of my blood. It was this experience and the white paintings of Rauschenberg that led me to compose 4'33", which I had described in a lecture at Vassar College some years before when I was in the flush of my studies with Suzuki ( A Composer's Confessions, 1948), my silent piece."

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Donald M. Cleland A History of the Santa Monica Schools 1876-1951, Santa Monica Unified School District, February 1952 (Copied for the Santa Monica Library, July 22, 1963). 140 pp., 1952, 1950s, 1940s

     Currently, the subjects of the high school are divided into eleven departments: art, business, English, foreign languages, homemaking, mathematics, mechanical arts, music, physical education, science, and the social studies. The high school program prepares the student for entrance into college or university, specific courses being offered as preparatory to advanced study in such fields as architecture, agriculture, art, business administration, dentistry, home economics, law, librarianship, medicine, nursing, optometry, pharmacy, physical education, science and mathematics, and teaching. [70. Ibid., pp. 13-14.]

The Counseling Program

     The high school counseling program has developed rapidly in the last ten years. With a competent staff and the time provided to insure the best results, the program has greatly helped students to plan future educational pursuits or to choose areas of vocational interest. Through the counseling program, the teachers and administrators have been able to provide classes that would meet the needs and interests of the present-day high school student in helping him to achieve his vocational goal. [71. Student Manual, p. 7.]

     Students are given individual counseling by the same counselors throughout their high school careers. This guidance program begins in the 9A grade when the students make their plans for the senior high school, and is followed by one or more individual conferences each succeeding semester until graduation. In the counseling offices are files which contain information concerning grades, activities, standardized test results, interest inventories, and special interview records beginning with the seventh grade. With this information at hand, the counselors strive to assist the students in understanding their own abilities, aptitudes, and personality traits, and then to make choices of the school opportunities that will most likely lead to their best development.

     Students are also given information concerning vocational opportunities and are assisted in the evaluation of their own interests and aptitudes for various occupations. In the 10A English classes and senior psychology classes, units of vocational study are presented. In addition, the counselors give further assistance in vocational guidance since the choice of courses, particularly in the major field, is closely related to the the student's vocational goals. Vocational materials are available in the library and in the counselor's offices. Special arrangements are made for students who wish to enter the special trades to take a portion of their work at the Santa Monica Technical School.

     In the spring semester each year, vocational conference is held for all students. Over forty meetings are planned in response to students' interests and each student attends meetings of his choice. A business or professional man or woman who is experienced in each field describes the vocation and answers the students' questions. Following the conference, the senior boys and girls have an opportunity to get further firsthand information about the world of work by going out into the community on Boys' and Girls' Career Days.

     " . . . A. Ewing Konold, principal since 1945, has been particularly successful in making the community aware of the excellent program that is carried on at Santa Monica High School. Many recent graduates have brought additional honor to the school by winning scholarships to colleges and universities with the state and throughout the the United States. [72. Personal interview with A. Ewing Konold, May 25, 1951; Santa Monica, California.]

     The community has actively endorsed and supported a program of athletics in the high school. The physical education department has produced teams that have won many conference and statewide championships. The trophy case in the foyer of the administration building is evidence of the success and interest shown by the students in the accomplishments of the school.

     An active student body program is governed by the Associated Student Body Officers and Cabinet. The elected representatives of the classes and other student organizations carry on a program of extracurricular activities including assemblies, rallies, boys' and girls' leagues and the like. The student cabinet sponsors and controls an active club program which is academic, hobby, honor, service, social, or vocational in character.

     In a period of sixty years, the Santa Monica High School has become an established part of the community. By having only one high school, the support and pride of the community is vested in the one institution. The years have brought many changes in subject and personnel to the high school, but for the most part the community, the Board of Education, and the administrators of the schools have looked favorably upon the overall educational program and the results that have been achieved.

     " . . .

     A summary of the period of rapid expansion in the schools would be incomplete without again giving credit to the electors of the Santa Monica City School District who, insistently spurred on by the women of the community, gave their support to providing adequately for the large increase in school enrollment and the constant betterment of the educational program.

     The present chapter begins with a description of a campaign waged by the Board of Education to establish a separate high school and remove the higher grades from their cramped quarters in the original Sixth Street school. Undaunted by the defeat of a bond issue to erect a high school, the Board submitted another proposition to the vote of the electors to build an additional grammar school. Upon the approval of the bonds and the construction of the Lincoln School , the Board proceeded to rent the new building to the high school. Thus was their original purpose achieved.

     As the city developed, the board helped to solve the problem of increased enrollment in the elementary schools by securing the passage, in less than one year's time, of three bond issues totaling $135,000 and used the money for the construction of six new buildings in various parts of the district. Five of the new buildings were of brick construction, which not only made them considerably safer from fire but created jobs for local labor and industry.

     " . . . Today, with community interest vested in one high school, the educational program at the secondary level is more nearly meeting the needs of all students. Not only does it prepare them for work in colleges and universities, but it provides also terminal courses in business, homemaking, and mechanical arts, as well as scholastic and cultural experiences that better equip the high school graduate for his role as an adult member of the community.

     In Chapter IV, analysis will be made of the further refinement and expansion of the organization of the schools, starting with the establishment of two junior high schools in 1912 and 1914, respectively.

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

J. J. O'Connor and E. F. Robertson George Dantzig* Biographies of Mathematicians http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Mathematicians/Dantzig_George.html 2005, 1952, 1940s

      "During my first year at Berkeley I arrived late one day to one of Neyman's classes. On the blackboard were two problems which I assumed had been assigned for homework. I copied them down. A few days later I apologized to Neyman for taking so long to do the homework-the problems seemed to be a little harder to do than usual. I asked him if he still wanted the work. He told me to throw it on his desk. I did so reluctantly because his desk was covered with such a heap of papers that I feared my homework would be lost there forever.

     "About six weeks later, one Sunday morning about eight o'clock, Anne and I were awakened by someone banging on our front door. It was Neyman. He rushed in with papers in hand, all excited: "I've just written an introduction to one of your papers. Read it so I can send it out right away for publication." For a minute I had no idea what he was talking about. To make a long story short, the problems on the blackboard which I had solved thinking they were homework were in fact two famous unsolved problems in statistics. That was the first inkling I had that there was anything special about them. "

      "When the United States entered World War II in 1941 Dantzig put his graduate studies on hold for a second time, although by this time he had already completed the coursework and written his Ph.D. thesis. He went to Washington and joined the Air Force as a civilian. From 1941 to 1946 he was Head of the Combat Analysis Branch, U.S.A.F. Headquarters Statistical Control. In 1944 he was awarded the War Department Exceptional Civilian Service Medal. He wrote of his time there:-

 "My office collected data about sorties flown, bombs dropped, aircraft lost... I also helped other divisions of the Air Staff prepare plans called "programs". ... everything was planned in greatest detail: all the nuts and bolts, the procurement of airplanes, the detailed manufacture of everything. There were hundreds of thousands of different kinds of material goods and perhaps fifty thousand specialties of people. My office collected data about the air combat such as the number of sorties flown, the tons of bombs dropped, attrition rates. I also became a skilled expert on doing planning by hand techniques. "

      "In 1946, after a break of five years, Dantzig returned to Berkeley for one semester, receiving his doctorate in mathematics from the University of California. He was offered an academic post by Berkeley but turned down the offer:-

"Berkeley made me an offer, but I didn't like it because it was too small. Or, to be more exact, my wife did not like it. It was a grand salary of fourteen hundred dollars a year. She did not see how we could live on that with our child David."

      "By June 1946 he was in Washington considering a number of different possible jobs. His colleagues at the Pentagon asked him to take on the job of mechanizing the planning process. This appeared to fit in exactly with his interests so that year he was appointed Mathematical Advisor at the Defense Department to undertake the task.

      "In 1947 Dantzig made the contribution to mathematics for which he is most famous, the simplex method of optimisation. It grew out of his work with the U.S. Air Force where he become an expert on planning methods solved with desk calculators. In fact this was known as "programming," a military term that, at that time, referred to plans or schedules for training, logistical supply or deployment of men. Dantzig mechanised the planning process by introducing "programming in a linear structure", where "programming" has the military meaning explained above. The term "linear programming" was proposed by T.J. Koopmans during a visit Dantzig made to the RAND corporation in 1948 to discuss his ideas. Having discovered his algorithm, Dantzig made an early application to the problem of eating adequately at minimum cost. He describes this in his book Linear programming and extensions (1963):-

     "One of the first applications of the simplex algorithm was to the determination of an adequate diet that was of least cost. In the fall of 1947, Jack Laderman of the Mathematical Tables Project of the National Bureau of Standards undertook, as a test of the newly proposed simplex method, the first large-scale computation in this field. It was a system with nine equations in seventy-seven unknowns. Using hand-operated desk calculators, approximately 120 man-days were required to obtain a solution ... The particular problem solved was one which had been studied earlier by George Stigler (who later became a Nobel Laureate) who proposed a solution based on the substitution of certain foods by others which gave more nutrition per dollar. He then examined a "handful" of the possible 510 ways to combine the selected foods. He did not claim the solution to be the cheapest but gave his reasons for believing that the cost per annum could not be reduced by more than a few dollars. Indeed, it turned out that Stigler's solution (expressed in 1945 dollars) was only 24 cents higher than the true minimum per year $39.69."

      "In [11] Dantzig wrote . . .:-

     "Linear programming is viewed as a revolutionary development giving man the ability to state general objectives and to find, by means of the simplex method, optimal policy decisions for a broad class of practical decision problems of great complexity. In the real world, planning tends to be ad hoc because of the many special-interest groups with their multiple objectives."

      "But he also modestly wrote:-

"The tremendous power of the simplex method is a constant surprise to me."

      "The importance of linear programming methods was described, in 1980, by Laszlo Lovasz who wrote:-

     "If one would take statistics about which mathematical problem is using up most of the computer time in the world, then ... the answer would probably be linear programming."

      "Also in 1980 Eugene Lawler wrote:-

     "[Linear programming] is used to allocate resources, plan production, schedule workers, plan investment portfolios and formulate marketing (and military) strategies. The versatility and economic impact of linear programming in today's industrial world is truly awesome."

      "Balinski [4] writes:-

      "Mathematical programming has been blessed by the involvement of at least two exceptionally creative geniuses: George Dantzig and Leonid Kantorovich."

      "He then goes on to say that Kantorovich received the Nobel Prize for his contribution and expresses "outrage" that Dantzig did not."

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Pat Hartman Spade Cooley Virtual Venice http://www.virtualvenice.info 2/5/2005b, 1940s

     "Spade Cooley-In the early 1940s, the Venice Ballroom was turned into a country-western joint called the Foreman Phillips County Barn Dance. The new hybrid sound, combining traditional and city slicker music. would entertain as many as 4,000 munitions workers and other displaced rural folks until dawn. It was the site of a monumental Battle of the Bands between Bob Wills and his Texas Playboys, and Spade Cooley's outfit, which left Cooley holding the title "King of Western Swing." Cooley's story, like those of so many musicians associated with Venice, had a sad end. Suspecting his second wife of having an affair with Roy Rogers, he beat her to death (with their 14 year old daughter as unwilling witness) and died in prison less than a decade later."

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Jim Heimann Sins of the City: The Real Los Angeles Noir, Chronicle Books: San Francisco, CA, 1999, 159pp., 1940s    

     " . . . After the war, . . .

     " . . . beach front communities including Long Beach, Venice, and Santa Monica hosted "games of chance" that were just another form of illegal lottery. Bridge, keno, tango, and bingo parlors were everywhere. The thinly veiled gambling dens fed small-time bunco artists for a short period after the war but were slowly eliminated by the mid-fifties." p. 10

     " . . .

p. 32 [Caption: "Exhibitionism and body worship. Hedonist pursuits practiced in earnest at Muscle Beach in neaby Santa Monica, a suburb favored as a location by fiction writers." Jim Heinmann Collection photograph of a bodybuilder, flexing in front of the platform's equipment locker which has been inscribed Phil B. and Bill R., with Frosty Cup, Leo's Place, Burgers behind the platform.]"

pp. 146, 147 ["The Venice Pier pulled in crowds of revelers looking for inexpensive excitement. Writers of the noir found it the perfect locale for fog-shrouded intrigue, ca. 1940. Top another front for penny-ante crime, mechanical horse races were shut down when investigators exposed their fixed wirings. Bottom."Bridgo parlors with exotic names such as Carneo, Vogue, Shamrock, and Canasto were a variation of the same old con game that kept popping up in beachfront amusement zones. The "sucker games" were wiped out in Venice in a clampdown of the racket in 1949."]

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Joseph Giovannini Oral History of Esther McCoy Archives of American Art, 1987, 1940s

 
. . .
 
 
JG: So you entered the program at Douglas after Pearl Harbor at some point?
 
EM: Yeah. As soon as the program was set up, I heard about it, and I applied, and I got on.
 
JG: Was that because you knew--was it patriotic for you or you needed the money or . . .
 
EM: I wanted to, and it was very clear, it seemed very clear to us, that all of us would have to be part of war work in some way. So I actually chose. I said, "I'm going to be a draftsman." You can see my age--I still say "drafts-man." I'll never be able to change that--and "person" is to long.
 
JG: Unnatural, it's true. You detailed wings of planes?
 
EM: Yes.
 
JG: You wrote a little bit about it in that wonderful introduction to the piece in the Whitney show on design, called High Styles, and I recall your having spoken about Shorty the foreman, and how he went off to solve . . . wings . . .
 
EM: Oh, that, yes. We had a six week's refresher on mathematics in which we learned engineering drawing, the special kinds of things that you did, and engineering drawing, as opposed to other kinds. Then we went to the plant and we had a month there, where we had a week in four different departments. The week that I shall always remember was in experimental, because here was this wonderful character who was out of the past and who really couldn't face all these kids coming in who knew nothing about it. Before that, the planes were built maybe two at a time, [that] would be a big order. Then, suddenly there were all these enormous orders, and he wasn't used to it. could see the old order dying, and I could see how sad it was, and how he--angry . . .
 
[END TAPE 3 SIDE 2]
 
[BEGIN TAPE 4, SIDE 1, JUNE 8]
 
JG: We were talking about drafting at Douglas, one of the weeks of introduction and Esther's memory of the old order--the eclipse of the old order where they used to do two planes at a time and now the orders were for many more planes . . .
 
EM: Yeah, it was the experimental department. I liked this most of all because I saw someone really working. It was still a handcraft operation with him. Everything else upstairs was mechanized and it was becoming more and more mechanized, and, by the end of the war, everything would be completely mechanized.
 
     That, by the way, was what gave us the hope that architecture, that building the houses would also become mechanized, but it never did. It should have, and that was what Konrad Wachsmann wanted, and that was what many other people wanted--to have a house, I think, in some cases where you could buy parts of it, as you could in Japan, and put them together. Or at least I was told you could in Japan; I'm not sure you could. Then you could build your house as you wanted, out of these parts. But it didn't go that far, but planes did become mechanized and that was one thing, at least.
 
     I went, many of the trainees went, to Westwood. I went to engineering in Westwood on La Cienega near Wilshire, the big hangars there. There were several thousand boards there, just one after another after another. I worked in the wing section and I did the detail drawings. The engineers were dull people. There was once, I was with maybe four or five of them, and something came up, and not one of them had ever heard the name Walt Whitman. Not one. I think, what they were up to, the intellectual engineer, was the one who read Time magazine. That's the high point.
 
. . .
 

JG: But why was there the architecture here? You were not as interested by it in New York; it was not happening there in the same way, was it?

 
EM: No. It's because, I think, here, no one was watching. And you could just do it your own way. The person who understood this best, then talking to, was Cesar Pelli, who knew that it was a good place where you could just do what you liked. But that's the history of Los Angeles, always, from the Spanish days, that it always went its own way. Even, you know (who was the writer who wrote about the early Spanish days?), he said that people would not--you know, they had to go some place, and they wouldn't--they never walked, they always rode a horse. It's the same thing today, the way they never walk, they always drive a car. So it was always that way.
 
JG: What about the difference between architecture on the East Coast, and modernism on the East Coast, and the modernism here?
 
. . .
 
 
EM: Who was that?
 
JG: [note: 1938-1947 Schindler renovation, homeowner/music critic Peter Yates] Oh, it was the hillside house, I think in Silver Lake. It's the one with that wonderful rail, that kind of a paperclip rail, up to the uphill part of the site [inaudible]. My impression of the art of that time, through Arts and Architecture, was that there was a lot of conversation between people in different fields, but apparently that was really not the case.
 
EM: That is what a following generation always likes to believe. It sounds as if they must have liked each other, and they must have discussed, talked a lot. And I know that they always felt, in Europe, during that transition period, transition magazine, that everyone liked each other. But I have never found that true. In any case, there were--and I know Neutra was the most jealous of people.
 
JG: Was there more sort of interdisciplinary conversation in New York than here, or was it that there was more conversation in New York?
 
EM: More conversation, but I think there was as much backbiting everywhere.
 
JG: My impression of that is through Arts and Architecture, which seems to be quite remarkable in tracking . . . Such a high caliber publication in which there was literary criticism and music criticism and architecture.
 
EM: Yes, yes.
 
JG: I know that period primarily through Arts and Architecture, and that remains my impression.
 
. . .
 
 
JG: So, I think we're jumping the gun here [inaudible]. Was there anything more about the time at Douglas? Anything more that interests you?
 
EM: It was the time, the time it took. You were really--and you know, you had to be so damned organized to be able to get a house in order and everything, to get food. You had to stand in line for your meat and other food, after working a ten-hour or a nine-and-a- half-hour day, so it was exhaustion.
 
     There was a woman, the only person about my age (she was slightly older than I was) who was in this program, who had a very wicked sense of humor, and so that helped enormously, that helped enormously. Then, when I chose to go to engineering, she decided to go too, and so we were in different departments there but we could always have great laughs together. I decided I wanted to get into architecture after I left Douglas. I knew we'd all be out when the war was over, and so she decided to do that too. She got a job with Fred Barienbrock, who did the Santa Monica City Hall, you know. It's a pretty poor job. She was loaned to Edla Muir; they loaned people back and forth, Ed and Fred.
 
JG: You tried to apply to architecture school after the war, didn't you?
 
EM: Yes, I did; I tried to get in USC. I knew it might be a terrible problem of money, but I did try. I was--oh, this was something! I was completely, you know, discouraged. A woman, and a woman who was over thirty--that was just the laughs for them.
 
JG: There was no other architecture school that you were interested in?
 
EM: No. By this time I had, I was so deep in architecture that...
 
JG: So that was in '44? '45?
 
EM: Yes, '45. Now here's something I never talk about. It was when we had a week off. We had a week off each year at Douglas, a vacation, and we went both times to Ensenada. We would rent a house there. I wrote during the week fifty to seventy-five pages of a novel, and it was about an architect, and it shows that I was interested, by 1943, enough in architecture to want to do a book on one.
 
JG: Is that among your papers?
 
EM: Yeah. Each year Houghton Mifflin gives awards for--you submit manuscripts and they give you awards or something, not awards, but they give you a contract. Mine was sent in, this fifty pages, because at the end of that week I went back to work, and just mailed it off to Houghton Mifflin. Well! Goddamn if I didn't place--there were two of us first. It's funny, that's my luck in a way; it was the same thing on this novel I'd written in Key West, which I'd cut down, which had been . . .
 
JG: . . . out of four.
 
EM: Yeah. Just out of the running, just out of the running. Well, this was second. So, I did get a small advance, and I'm sorry to say--I don't talk about it because lots of it was based on, the character was based on Tim, but it was a Tim who was a young architect, which Tim was not, and which he never stood still long enough to . . . And he certainly would not have been a modern, and this man was a modern.
 
JG: That was a great distinction at the time, to be modern, not to be modern?
 
EM: Oh, yes indeed, yes. It was like being . . . Sinning and not sinning. [Laughs] I think I got fifteen hundred dollars which was just. . . And this was after two years at Douglas, and it was after V-E day--or was it V-J day, whichever was first--and so the war was winding down, obviously, so I quit. I got this money, I quit, and I went to my typewriter. But I also put a drafting table by the typewriter, because after I'd just tossed off a novel, I wanted to go back into architecture. I wanted to go into architecture.
 
. . .
 
 
JG: We were talking about drafting at Douglas, one of the weeks of introduction and Esther's memory of the old order--the eclipse of the old order where they used to do two planes at a time and now the orders were for many more planes...
 
EM: Yeah, it was the experimental department. I liked this most of all because I saw someone really working. It was still a handcraft operation with him. Everything else upstairs was mechanized and it was becoming more and more mechanized, and, by the end of the war, everything would be completely mechanized.
 
     That, by the way, was what gave us the hope that architecture, that building the houses would also become mechanized, but it never did. It should have, and that was what Konrad Wachsmann wanted, and that was what many other people wanted--to have a house, I think, in some cases where you could buy parts of it, as you could in Japan, and put them together. Or at least I was told you could in Japan; I'm not sure you could. Then you could build your house as you wanted, out of these parts. But it didn't go that far, but planes did become mechanized and that was one thing, at least.
 
. . .
 
 
JG: You know how these were the halcyon days. So when did you start writing for Arts and Architecture magazine?
 
EM: Let's see, I met John in 1932. The first thing I wrote for him was on . . . I think it was the issue, 1951, a whole issue on building, on residential building in Mexico. Now I may have done one or two small stories for him before that. I think I probably did, but they would have been unimportant. This was the one. But I'd been writing during that time, for other magazines, and so I wouldn't have written much for John. John didn't pay.
 
JG: What was your first article on architecture? You were at the Schindler house, with Schindler, weren't you?
 
EM: Yeah, I wrote about Schindler in 1945. The first one, though, was a letter to the New York World, on a review, Harry Hansen, a review on Le Corbusier's book Cathedrals Are White. I wrote a letter about his review. It had to do with the silos, and silo architecture, and he published it. So you can imagine my pride, in having a letter in the New York World, in the Harry Hansen column. [Laughs]
 
JG: This was the newspaper you had first gravitated to when you were in New York?
 
EM: Yes, oh, it was a great newspaper. [Inaudible]
 
JG: When did it fail?
 
EM: Oh, the bastards, the sons and daughters, wouldn't take the losses any more. [Laughs] I think it was in the thirties or forties. It was a Depression death.
 
. . .
 
JG: This is Joseph Giovannini, in Santa Monica, with Esther McCoy, Side 2 of Tape 4. This is from the...?
 
EM: This is from manuscript; it's what now is in the typewriter. It's on Schindler. I want to finish it; there's a celebration for his hundredth birthday in October, and I'm writing about my days with Schindler. It's how I set up a typewriter, drafting board next to my typewriter, and [EM reads]
 
     I did all sorts of cross-sections and then necessary details. The house had an L- plan, like one of Harwell Harris's I knew in Santa Monica Canyon, and many of the details were borrowed from Neutra. The plans could easily have been squeezed into three pages, but with all my cross-sections and details, I stretched them out to six. I did this mainly because I wanted to keep the drawing close to me, hoping that the pencil under my hand would teach me something more than how to set down the condition, when a wall meets a floor or a roof. I was hoping that if I'd listen carefully, I would get a clue to why one building was wonderful and another ordinary. That is, the pencil yielded no secrets. I stuck close to Neutra and Harris.
 
     That's enough, isn't it? And so that's the transition between . . .Then I gave up on the novel because, after rewriting it, then the great success of Ayn Rand's book put me at a disadvantage. I must say, that her research on the period, Chicago period of Sullivan and Wright, was fascinating.
 
JG: You gave up because you didn't want to continue, or because you'd finished the second draft and the publisher didn't like it?
 
EM: The publishers didn't like the second draft, and I could have worked out something, but I didn't think I . . . By this time a year had passed, and I was in other writing, and
 
JG: It's hard to go back.
 
EM: Yes. And also, there were many things that I was learning so much more about architecture by this time, working for Schindler, that it became really passé. It was not what I believed, and so this was another reason why I didn't want to rework that again.
 
JG: So you were working with Schindler at that time?
 
EM: Yes.
 
JG: What houses were you working on with him?
 
EM: Well, let's see. I can't find the Gebhard book on Schindler where I've marked the ones I worked on, but let's see. I think the first . . . I don't remember the first house I worked on. I've gone over the names many times but it was a project . . . But it was extremely painful because I didn't know . . .
 
     I was to get a couple of elevations ready for the blueprinter when he got back, to be ready. He was off on his jobs. I couldn't find where it indicated in any way what the windows were to be in the living room, and it was a great pain, my first day there, feeling that it was my fault.
 
     Finally he came in, and I had to admit defeat.
 
     He said, "Oh, that's OK," and he just took the pencil, a blunt pencil, and drew in something fast and said, "Call the blueprinter." And he said, "I don't know what I want to do with that yet."
 
     So he just waited, you know, was waiting. They said, always, at City Hall, that they knew that he was on his jobs, and that he'd take care of them. Nothing would get by him.
 
JG: How did you get the job there? You knew you wanted to work with him, or did you . . .?
 
EM: No, I was very much interested in the house, and I knew Pauline. Well. It's easier to read it. Can I read it?
 
     I saw the house first in 1941, when Berk and I were taken to meet Pauline, and then . . . I couldn't understand it. It was curious and disturbing. What Pauline said about it was poetic, but to someone who had lately worried about 032 metal at Douglas and was concerned with how things were put together, the Kings Road house was a closed world. At Pauline's I stared at the clerestories, my eye followed the transfer of loads from member to member, the transition between high roof and low roof. I tried to guess how it was done. I tried to guess why it was done. I even tried to guess how it would be drawn. I gave up questioning Pauline because the kind of questions I asked brought only assurances that structure was not the route to an aesthetic appreciation of Schindler.
 
     Then one day Pauline told me that Schindler's only draftsman had been called into the armed service. She suggested that I apply. I'd seen Schindler only once He was standing by his parked car kicking a tire. His thick dark hair stood out from his head in a wiry wreath (he always cut it himself), and his heavy torso was covered with a silk shirt with V-neck and no cuffs. He designed it himself.
 
     [inaudible] was offensive. He looked dusty and tired. I remember then that one of the reasons that people said he was not serious about architecture was that he did his own contracting. How could anyone serious about architecture spend most of the day on the job sites, one of my architect friends asked.
 
     It took some courage to go to see him. I selected from among a dozen or so engineering drawings the two most precisely drawn and most complicated. Then I cleaned up the drawings of the house that I designed. I dressed in something that made me look serious and dependable. What did I expect? A cool dismissal. My wildest hopes were to be in the office long enough to study a set of drawings of one of his houses.
 
    At eleven o'clock one morning I went along the row of wild eugenias to his door, a heavy redwood swinging door with a small glazed peephole in which there was a sign reading "By appointment only." The door was ajar. I entered.
 
     The drafting room was off a hail to the right. It was a large room lighted by windows and clerestory on the west and thin slits of glass between the concrete panels on the east. The room was divided in the middle by a low row of shelves, with the two drafting boards at the far end. At the near end was Schindler's long desk, and back of it was a piano bench covered with a piece of cowhide. Along the west wall, was a table with nothing on it but a small, portable typewriter, locked into uppercase. [Laughs]
 
     Schindler was sitting at the drafting board with his back to me. When I spoke he turned around, obviously annoyed at being disturbed. I could see that I'd come at a bad time. "I wanted to ask you about a job. Maybe I should come back another time," I said.
 
     He didn't look up from the drawing as he asked me what I had done. I took the two engineering drawings out, and said I had been two years at Douglas. He brushed them aside. "Aircraft draftsmen never know anything about the plane except the part they're working on," he said. Then, indifferently, he unrolled my drawings of the house.
 
     I dreaded to hear what he would say about them. I hoped he would only say, "You need more experience," and I could leave. Instead he anchored them to the very dirty drawing on the board with a long flat camel's hair brush, and looked at them closely. Then he turned the pages, once even referring back to the plan on page one.
 
     "The glass," he said. He was looking at the strip of glass I'd used in all the rooms between door height and ceiling height.
 
     I waited. I was ready with the reason for using the glass, to bring south light into north-facing rooms, to see the trees when the curtains were pulled, and then a reason I would not have had the guts to give, to make the house fly, perhaps a hangover from working so long on the airplane wings. But he wasn't curious about why I used the glass, but how I'd used it. The glass was broken up with the studs.
 
     "You could have used a longer span, you know that." That was the most encouraging thing he could have said, that I should have known something. Once pointed out, I saw it immediately, but the architectural standards book I'd been studying deigned no variations on the 2 x 4 stud system, 16 inches on center.
 
     There were other bits of advice, and with each one, I became more confident. For instance, I'd located the sofa too close to the flow of traffic. I wanted to thank him profusely and go home and rework the drawings. Then I could take them out next week to another architect.
 
     I said in apology, "I tried to get in USC, but they discouraged me."
 
     "The less to unlearn," he said. "Come in tomorrow at eleven, eleven to five or six. I can give you a dollar an hour."
 
     I was stunned. He'd already helped me, and a dollar an hour was not bad. I was getting $1.30 an hour at Douglas when I quit.
 
     My job the first day was to have a set of drawings of a house ready for the blueprinter when he returned from the job sites. We went over the drawings together before he left, and it all seemed clear. Blow up two elevations, which he'd done almost free-hand, in 1/8 scale, to 1/4 scale, use a four-foot module, and with a grid system, it was easy to follow the dimensions.
 
     "Don't etch them," he said, referring obviously to my neat engineering drawings. But after he left I discovered that there was no way to get the dimensions for the view windows in the living room.
 
 
     Now, is that enough?
JG: It's . . .
 
EM: This piece, which is called Happy Birthday, R.M.S., for celebration of his hundredth birthday, begins
 
     The Eugenia hedge at the north side of 83335 was neatly clipped to head height with not a sprig out of place, while the one to the south grew wild and tall with tufts shooting out everywhere. Two people of different tastes and of equal strength obviously controlled the landscaping of the house on Kings Road. It was the same inside. On the north, the canvas of the sliding doors had been replaced by glass, the concrete wall panels covered with mahogany plywood or painted a Frank Lloyd Wright sun burnt apricot, and the redwood beams painted white. It was as if the house stood up by the pressure of opposing wills. I went to work on the south side in the spring of 1944 for the architect R.M. Schindler. On the north side lived my friend Pauline Schindler, who, after ten or so years of absence, returned to a divided house. The two sides were connected by one kitchen in the house, which Pauline took over.
 
     That's enough.
 
[END TAPE 4, SIDE 2] [NOTE: the last half of the tape is blank]
 
[BEGIN TAPE 5, SIDE 1]
 

     JG: . . . for the Archives of American Art, on Saturday, November 14, 1987, in Santa Monica. Esther?

 
. . .
 
EM: In 1940 I married Berkeley Tobey, and in 1941, at the end of '41, we were on a picnic at Malibu with George and Elaine Biddle. When we came up and got to radios, we found out about Pearl Harbor. That was the end of the honeymoon and the beginning of a wholly new life. The end of the Depression. The end of leisure, and writing at leisure. I applied for admission to a training program at Douglas for engineering draftsmen. It was mainly made up of women, of 4-F's, and of--well, that's about the main thing, most of them were under forty. They were all under forty.
 
JG: Men and women?
 
EM: Yes. So we reviewed mathematics and worked on engineering drawings for six weeks; then we went for a month through various departments at Douglas, before we were assigned to drafting boards. The place that interested me most was the experimental department, where there was a man who had worked with Douglas on models of early planes, and he was very unhappy about all these young people coming in, who really didn't know the plane, and didn't love planes the way he did. It made him really physically sick, all of this, and everything coming down in triplicate, or having to go up from him in triplicate. What he would do would be to go to the plane and fit a part, come back and draw it up on the board, and then cut it out of sheet metal, and go and fit it on and see if it worked.
 
JG: What was his name?
 
EM: I don't know. We called him Shorty. I don't know his name. I was in that department for a week. It was in one of the hangars at Douglas, very, very cold, and grim. Then I went to engineering, which was not at Santa Monica but it was off Wilshire on Sepulveda, and there were maybe a thousand drawing boards or more, just one after another. I worked on the wing section for the most part. That meant drawing lightening holes which were in wing assemblies. The lightening holes were being changed constantly, so you'd just check out the electric eraser, and erase what you'd done, and draw in the changes.
 
JG: I don't know what a lightening hole is.
 
EM: In the wing. It's the rib, a wing rib, and the hole is to . . . The thing about planes is that you measure weight as much as possible, to keep them as light as possible. A wing rib is stronger if it has holes in it, and it's also lighter. So that was a lot of what I did. I was there for two years.
 
JG: Doing the same thing?
 
EM: Yes. I worked on various parts. It was all on the wing section, what I did.
 
JG: Had you known how to draft before?
 
EM: Yes.
 
JG: You learned how to draft then, or before?
 
EM: No, before. I'd been interested in it, and I learned it from a friend of mine who was building houses, a Canadian. I liked it very much. It was a nine-hour day, and the engineers I found were very stupid. Their idea of intellectual reading was Time magazine. There was one time when something I mentioned, something came up about Walt Whitman, and not one of the engineers standing around my board had ever heard of him. It's sort of typical.
 
. . .
     
JG: If back is Douglas, you were talking about engineers, and you had been there for two years . . .
 
EM: So then, we had one week off a year, at Douglas, and we'd gone to Ensenada a number of times before the war started, and we went there
 
JG: You and your husband?
 
EM: Yes, for vacations. While I was there, the week, I started a novel and got about a hundred pages. And so when I came back, I slowly typed it up and I sent it out to Houghton Mifflin. You know, they had young writers. So I got a . . . Two people were awarded this whatever it was, the award. So then I stopped Douglas at that time, after two years, and wrote the book. In the middle of it, the person I was writing about, or who was the protagonist, died. I was very unhappy about it, really just thrown off. It was about architecture. I did an enormous amount of reading about architecture at the time. When it was turned in, Ayn Rand's book The Fountainhead had come out a couple of months before, and it was making a great hit.
 
JG: What year? Do you recall what year?
 
EM: It would be late '43, I think. You could find out the time of publication of The Fountainhead. They wanted me to rewrite it and put in more architecture. I tried to. It was very disturbing. Anyway, it was dropped. About this time, I decided to go into . . . While I was writing, I had a drafting board by the typewriter, and I began designing a house. At the time I left Douglas, all the young architects there, and engineers, were designing houses for themselves. Most of them were engineering feats of some sort or other. I see some of them along the beach now, some of them that had very novel kinds of construction. Turn it off. [Machine is turned off, and on again].
 
JG: Okay, we're on again.
 
EM: I designed a house.
 
JG: After Douglas?
 
EM: After Douglas, I designed a house. I bought a book of architectural standards, and then [laughing] at Douglas one of my bosses was Rodney Walker, who had worked in Schindler's office and was very much interested in low-cost housing and had designed some case studies for Arts and Architecture. So he gave me a set of drawings, and I had another set from someone, I can't remember whose it was. There were a great many architects at Douglas. They would stay there until they were called into the service. One was Bill Becket.
Let's see, let me get back on track. Where was I going?
 
JG: You were talking about designing your own house.
 
EM: Yes. So I wrote something about this in the L.A. Architect, published in October 1987. After finishing the house, I did endless sections, you know, just to try them out. I think the odd thing about it was that I had a transom strip between all rooms, and even the bathroom, you know, so light would just pour into the place. I was also writing.
 
     I knew Pauline Schindler; I'd met her through Beryl Lacaba, who was the ex-wife of Gregory Lacaba, and they were both in the radical movement, which I was too. I was fascinated with the Schindler house, where Pauline lived. She had been separated from Schindler for eight or ten years, and then she moved back when Mark was ready for high school. She moved back; they just split the house-legally separated and split the house down the middle, and he took the south side and she took the north side.
 
JG: She'd already been in there, and he was always in there?
 
EM: Yes. He was out for a little while he tried an office in the architect's building on Figueroa, but he wasn't happy and so moved back to King's Road. Anyway, I was just so fascinated with the house, with Pauline, seeing her there and not understanding how it was done, having been working on a house, and seeing how different this was, and how the difference between something that was really enormously important and my own, which was very modern. I was fascinated with modern. I'd already known Neutra's work and had seen quite a bit of it, and Harris. I knew Harris and Ain, and several others. I'd never seen a Schindler house until this. It was so different from the stripped-down work of Neutra.
 
     Pauline told me one time . . . I saw her maybe four or five times, often I'd see her because over the years I did reading and other work for Dreiser, who lived a block and a half from Pauline on King's Road. I would just go by her place sometimes, or when I had to go to Dreiser's. Then she told me once that Schindler's draftsman had left, had gone into the service (they were still being called up into the service at that time, it would be '44). So I cleaned up the drawings of the house that I'd done and got some engineering drawings together and took them in to Schindler. He was not interested in the engineering drawings. (This is all in the L.A. Architect piece that I did on Schindler's office, so I don't know whether I should go on too long about this. Do you think so?)
 
JG: Go ahead. Try to do things that are not covered in the article itself.
 
EM: Well. I was astonished anyway to have him offer me a job so quickly. He had no one in the office then. He never had more than two draftsman at a time in the office. Often he had students that would come for the summer, and some he would use on construction work. I worked there for two years, and worked on the . . . The first thing was to do some detailing on the church, Bethlehem Baptist Church, and then there were several others, houses, that I worked on. I don't have the book here. I marked them. Is that interesting?
 
JG: Go ahead.
 
EM: There were times too when . . .This was still wartime and materials were hard to get; they were frozen for the most part, or very restricted, for houses. Even after the war ended, when I was still working in the office, the shortages were so great that the office would be closed for several days or a week until materials became available.
 
JG: How did you get them, when they were short?
 
EM: God, they'd sit on the telephone for hours, you know--not hours, but, trying to find even 2 x 4's . . .
 
JG: Uh-huh. Did that make a difference in the design? If you could get 2 x 3's, would you use 2 x 3's?
 
EM: You can't use 2 x 3's; they're not permitted.
 
JG: Well, you can use them in some non-structural situations.
 
EM: Well, no. This would be for framing.
 
JG: But, I mean, did he make substitutions that affected the design?
 
EM: No, no. And they were working around the clock in the Northwest, you know, to get lumber down, so it was coming but just . . . No one knew when. And then often things would be stolen from the site. You couldn't stockpile because someone would be around with a truck.
 
JG: Was this just after the war or . . .
 
EM: Just after the war, mainly. Because even after the war there were restrictions on the type of building you could do--the square footage and what materials you could use.
 
JG: It was very small, wasn't it?
 
EM: Yes.
 
JG: The houses . . .
 
EM: Yes. And that's why in the case-study houses, they were two bedroom houses. But then, too, another reason for this was that the families during the Depression were much smaller. Two was a fairly large family during the Depression. After the war, when small houses were planned . . . You see, even before the Depression, there were not many small houses built. What you did was just to take an old big one and make do with it. Very little work had been done, experimenting with the small house. I think in England they had, and various other places, but not in the United States. So that's why the case-study house program was important-to get good designs for two-bedroom houses. An innovation was that they all had two baths, which was good.
 
     Now, where am I?
 
JG: About houses. At the time, did the floor plan reflect any change in, sort of the sociology of . . .
 
EM: Yes, yes, they did. Take Davidson's first case study. It had no halls, and it had the . . .
 
[END TAPE 5, SIDE 1]
 
[BEGIN TAPE 5, SIDE 2]
 
 
JG: This is Joseph Giovannini interviewing Esther [McCoy] for the Archives of American Art on Saturday, November 14th, in Santa Monica. We're continuing, Esther. We were talking about the floor plan?
 
EM: Yes. That was a hall-less floor plan, on the Davidson's case study in Brentwood. I'd almost have to show you the floor plan to show you how it worked, but the . . .
 
JG: What did it reflect about the family? There weren't servants?
 
EM: Yes. Also, there was a division, another new thing was, between the two bedrooms. There was space. They weren't banked together. Schindler had done that; he did that in the Pressburger house, which was the first one of his that I worked on. I guess that was about '44, and the master bedroom was separated from the children's wing. He may have started that; I don't know. But Wright had really established the open plan. It had come from others before him, but Wright was the one who gave it authority and gave it architectural significance.
 
JG: That was true of Wright in a lot of things. He was very derivative; there might have been a Leif Ericson who discovered America first but Columbus was the one who made the significant discovery.
 
EM: Yes. So, what shall I say now.
 
JG: We were back in about '46 or '47. You were talking about the two-bedroom houses, two bathrooms.
 
. . .
 
EM: The case-study house program was initiated in 1945. Many people have asked since then why was not Schindler invited to do one. There was a great distinction between the postwar architects and the pre-war architects. Most of the prewar architects were not invited, the ones who were important. First of all, it was a program that was planned to be short-lived, but it was so successful that it went on and on. It was not only the case-study house, there were all sorts of houses that were built as model houses, and they were constantly visited. They were very popular, some on Wilshire Boulevard. One was Neutra's plywood house.
 
JG: In Brentwood?
 
EM: Yes, it was moved to Brentwood, but it was first a model house and was moved there. It was bought by John Entenza's father's law partner, whose name was . . . I've forgotten her first name, but her last name was Gramer. She bought it and moved it to the Brentwood location, where it now still is. Any place you'd drive, there would be some model house, flags out, "open to the public," and you could see it. They were mainly ranch houses, or colonials, or salt boxes, anything, but this was the only case studies that were modern. Another thing, too, they had all modern furnishings and modern kitchens, and the landscaping was done by good modern landscape architects.
 
JG: Was this the only place in the country where this sort of modern case-study house was . . .
 
EM: Yes, yes it was.
 
JG: Neutra had been asked by Levitt to study Levittown, but I guess that was a little bit later.
 
EM: That was later, yes.
 
JG: That Levitt decided against doing the modern . . .
 
     Can you place a little bit the importance of modernism, the presence of modernism in Southern California and its importance for the modern movement?
 
EM: Well, it was late coming. It was strong, but it was late, and most of the architects . . . First let me finish why Neutra, why Schindler was not asked and others . . . The case-study house program started as a short-lived thing, and some of John Entenza's friends and Charles Eames's friends from . . . Where did he go to school?
 
JG: Oh, Cranbrook.
 
EM: Cranbrook were invited in. Those are the younger, Eero Saarinen, and others. But after this group, the only older ones . . . There were older ones, Davidson and Wurster. And it was, not Honnold & Rex, but, well, Rex was the one of that partnership who designed the house. Most of the houses that were case-studies, after these first six or eight, were ones that were in the works. The architect came to John, and told him, you know, that they had a house, and it looked good, and so then they worked it out to see whether it was going to fit. It usually did.
 
     Some of them were not all that good, the case studies. I wanted to take them out, when I did the book on the case studies, but the editor wanted them all in. That's why, if Ain had had a house, and had gone to John, he would have done it, put it in the case-study house program.
     But after a while it was the younger ones, and that was a very important thing. It was why the magazine became so important, because all the post-war architects wanted to be published in it. It was a sign of having arrived to have something in Arts and Architecture.
 
     While I was working for Schindler I did . . . Schindler, like so many of the other older architects, was rather contemptuous of John Entenza. They looked upon him as a Johnny-come-lately. And since John was more oriented to Europe, and Schindler by this time had cut himself off from Europe, he was rather cool to John. And many things, you know, I would take of Schindler's. Call John and ask him to publish things of Schindler's as they were photographed, and Schindler was always critical about the way the stories were handled. They were not too happy with John, the older architects, and they felt he was too much toward Europe and not enough toward Wright and the modern, the native. What is it now I wanted to get back to?
 
. . .
 
EM: . . . peppered, yes [laughing], on the West Coast. The only magazine . . . All the Eastern magazines still printed eclectic stuff, along with modern. Arts and Architecture was the only one that printed just modern. I was writing to Harwell Harris yesterday, telling him this, because he had said some nasty things about John Entenza to Carter Manny and Manny had told me, and was hurt by them, and I was trying to tell him the difference, you know, between the pre-war architects, post&endash;war architects, and that John really had done something to establish architecture on the West Coast. And I was writing for Arts and Architecture and they weren't all out of Europe . . . There were many things, and I did things on O'Gorman for the magazine which were, you know, you can't call those out of the International Style. (I'm wavering again, where was I going?)
 
JG: One thing about the O'Gorman's, it was not International Style but it was still Modernist.
 
EM: Well, there were his early things that were International Style, and then he went, really you know, to the Aztec, and it was the decorated. His library, on the campus of Mexico University, was a box that was papered with mosaics.
 
JG: But it was still volumetrically modern.
 
EM: Yes, yes.
 
     When California began sending things, you know, it's message, they got sent back at the Rockies; it never got to the East. [Laughs]
 
JG: [inaudible] never made it to the city.
 
EM: They did in San Francisco. San Francisco was always the city that was closely connected with the East, never Los Angeles.
 
JG: Well, what is it. I know this is a digression, but what is it about California that makes it so discredited, Southern California?
 
EM: Oh, well, because Los Angeles was a pueblo and San Francisco was a presidio and that meant that ships could not call into Los Angeles. They would go to San Francisco and goods had to be then brought down to Los Angeles. Los Angeles at that time had no port. It needed a great deal done to it, and the thieves could operate in Los Angeles. The center of the city was some distance from the sea, but also it was an agricultural center, Los Angeles, and it was always . . . The reason it's so spread out is because the large land holdings that were given to the . . . The land grants were enormous. That's how the ranch house developed; its form came really from just getting materials to these distant places, and also the heat and the way they lived, and they had enormous number of people to take care of. Often they had their own grist mills and their own . . . They had to be self-supporting. So the ranch houses were very long, broad buildings, and they had porches around because they lived outdoors. I wrote about this in California Magazine about two years ago, and it's called California, Los Angeles, something-Destiny through Geography, I think it is.
 
JG: Wasn't that in the collection of shows that occurred here?
 
EM: Yes, that was the basis of it. But this is more about what happened, how it developed.
 
JG: Uh-huh. Geography As Destiny [inaudible]?
 
EM: Yeah. So it would be freer, and Los Angeles always had the larger population; it had more thieves, and more speculators, and it was livelier from the beginning. And it's always from these very lively places that new design comes. You find it in Texas, you find it in Oklahoma, and in Arizona. You don't find it in Iowa or Michigan in the 19th century, or the first quarter of the 20th century. I think people who made their money easily, vast speculators, they were plungers. And I've written this about Bruce Goff, in writing about him, and people making money in oil. And there was that plungers approach to money. That's why so many houses of Bruce Goff could get built. I know that Lisa Ponti in Milan asked me, "Who are the people who build these, these Goff houses?" She couldn't understand. It's hard to explain to an Italian what oil does to people.
 
JG: But he also did them for people who didn't have very much money.
 
EM: True, yes, but it's the design that's unusual.
 
JG: Uh-huh. But it wasn't the plungers only who, it wasn't the financial plungers who . . .
 
EM: Oh, the atmosphere of plunging is in the air.
 
JG: I see.
 
EM: Yeah.
 
JG: . . . and by plunging you mean sort of bet what you've got and...
 
EM: Here today. Yeah. It's fast. It's like stock market money. You get it. It's like the yuppies who make it, the quick millionaires. Especially with oil coming in, waiting for that oil well to come in. I know the money. I went to a boarding school where there were many, many people with oil fortunes who came, and I'd always thought of myself as well off, but there's a great difference between being well off and oil rich. [Both laugh] I change that. I didn't think of myself as well off, I mean it was just money was never mentioned, but it was, you know, we were comfortable. Well, we were well off, damn it! To hell with it.
 
JG: Why . . . we can erase this if you don't want, but why do you think you're so reticent to talk about your family?
 
. . .
 
JG: Now, getting back to the 1940's, where were we?
 
EM: Now let's see, I got through Douglas, I got through Schindler, I was writing for Arts and Architecture. I wrote for other magazines. I was publishing stories; I had several stories in . . . I was writing while I was in Schindler's office, I was writing while I was at Douglas, and I seemed to have boundless energy. I don't know how I did it. And then did all the cooking. But I loved to cook.
 
JG: Mmmmm. She's a very good cook, for your information. [Both laugh]
 
EM: So, I was a scout for a magazine when Mademoiselle . . . I published some stories in Harper's Bazaar, which was considered a literary place. I mean they had a high percentage of stories in Best Short Stories of the Year. Also Mademoiselle. I hadn't published in Mademoiselle, but because I'd published in Bazaar, Mademoiselle asked me to scout architecture out here for them. They were starting a new magazine for young. So, I did. That's my first, in getting--they had to be young. So it was most of the young architects coming back from the war, and they were all modern. I think that was the first time that I began my concentration on young, the youngs, and the moderns. So I did stories for them all over Los Angeles and the West Coast, went up to the Northwest, did a series of stories for them from the Northwest, and went to around Santa Fe. That lasted about maybe three years. It would take about one week a month, went to that.
 
JG: This was in the early fifties? Late forties?
 
EM: No, that's the late forties.
 
JG: What happened to radical politics and your involvement in radical politics in the meantime.
 
EM: Well, the war changed a great deal of that. Many of us were not happy about the way things were going in the radical movement here, so it was easy to sort of drop out. I sort of dropped out. But then when the hearings came, in the fifties, there, you know, we were all so horrified that these things were--that they could do this--that it changed. I'm really a grass roots liberal, I suppose, when it comes down to it, and I resented all this.
     Let's see. Then, I did stories . . . Shulman--I'd gotten him to do stories for Mademoiselle magazine.
 
. . .
 
 
EM: I did an early film, Architecture West, in 1947. I wrote the text for it.
 
 
 
 
(Back to Sources)

 

 

Mark E. Kann Middle Class Radicalism in Santa Monica, Temple University Press: Philadelphia, 1986. 322pp., 1940s. 1930s

     " . . . As World War II approached, the relatively small Douglas Aircraft plant on the city's eastern extremity expanded to meet wartime demand, employing nearly 40,000 workers at the height of production. . . . " p. 38

     " . . . Between 1940 and 1944 . . . Santa Monica . . . experienced a 40 percent population growth during the decade."

 

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Paul J. Karlstrom and Susan Ehrlich Turning the Tide: Early Los Angeles Modernists 1920-1956, Barry M. Heisler Introduction Santa Barbara Museum of Art 1990, 1940s

 Paul J. Karlstrom Modernism in Southern California, 1920-1956, Reflections on the Art and the Times    

     "The 1940s were, of course, dominated by the war; and for the duration art activity in Southern California, as was the case elsewhere decreased or was redirected. Most of the area's artists served in the armed services or some related activity. Temporarily, issues of conservation versus modernism were set aside as the arrts were enlisted in a common cause. Unable to participate directly, modernists such as Peter Krasnow, Knud Merrild, and Hans Burkhardt recorded the great conflict through changes of content and style in their work. The war affected the development of the fine arts as surely as it determined the content and mood of Hollywood movies. The painters responded to global upheaval through highly personal expression. In contrast, the filmmakers reflected direct and indirect pressure to serve national ends by forming public opinion. . . .

     "Still, neither was exempt from the political forces that so dramatically shaped the creative climate of the period and infused American society with a regrettable degree of insularity, intolerance, and paranoia. . . . Hollywood was singled out as a particularly fertile area for "red-baiting." . . . postwar Southern California became a fairly heated battleground for the war on Communist-inspired art and "subversive" abstraction. The art world of Los Angeles in the 1940s and early 1950s was basically conservative, and, in alliance with anti-Communist crusaders, the dominant landscape school and academicians mounted an attack on the outnumbered and struggling modernists. . . ." pp. 26, 27

     " . . . Novelist Leon Feuchtwanger's advice to Brecht that Hollywood was cheaper than New York and one could make more money there, did not apply to the likes of Mondrian, Ernst, and other artists who gravitated to New York at the same time. . . ."

Peter Krasnow (1887-1979), 1990, 1940s

     ". . .

     "Born in 1887 in Zawill, a small Ukrainian village, Krasnow formed an attachment to craft early in life. As a child of six, he learned to grind and mix paint from his housepainter father, to whom he was apprenticed in his teens. In the wake of the Russian pogroms Krasnow fled to the United States, settling in Chicago in 1908 to study at the Art Institute. After earning his diploma in 1915 and working briefly as a children's art instructor at the Hebrew Institute of Chicago, Krasnow married social worker Rose Bloom and moved with her to New York in 1919. While his wife taught Hebrew classes, Krasnow labored at manual jobs and tried to establish himself in his profession. His efforts were rewarded in 1922 when the prestigious Whitney Studio Club mounted an exhibition in his honor. Yet despite the success of this debut, Krasnow felt dissatisfied with his work and with congested tenement life in Manhattan. Lured by gentle weather and open space, he ventured with his wife to Southern California.

     "After six months of travel, the couple reached Glendale in the fall of 1922. In December of that year Krasnow participated in a four-person exhibition at the Los Angeles County Museum of History, Science and Art. Two months later, in February 1923, he was invited by Stanton Macdonald Wright* to join the seminal Group of Independent Artists of Los Angeles Exhibition. This, together with his appearance in Whitney Studio Club Annuals of 1925 and 1926 and in one-man shows at the Los Angeles County Museum in 1927 . . . stamped Krasnow as a leading California modernist.

     "During these years, Krasnow enjoyed an active social life, carousing with a small but energetic avant-garde. Included within his social orbit were photography critic Sadikichi Hartmann, architects Rudolph Schindler, Richard Neutra, Kem Weber, and Gregory Ain, bookseller Jake Zeitlin, Blue Four agent and art educator Galka Scheyer, pioneer Synchromist Stanton Macdonald-Wright*, painters Lorser Feitelson, Knud Merrild, Boris Deutsh, and Henrietta Shore, film directors Lewis Milestone and Josef von Sternberg, art critics Anthony Anderson and Arthur Miller and photographer Edward Weston. From the Westons the Krasnows purchased a parcel of land on which Peter constructed a studio cottage in 1924. Headquartered in this simple shelter, he painted, sculpted, and dwelled for the next fifty-five years, intermingling his life and his art in a grand but spartan way.

     " . . . in the late forties . . .

     "Krasnow, however, veers from these painters[Gottlieb and Torres-Garcia] in his decorative élan and his more inventive palette, a quintessential product of Los Angeles. His juxtaposition of candied pinks and acquatic blues, henna mauves and grassy greens recalls the region's peculiar amalgam of the rustic with the plastic, the organic with the contrived. In his adroit handling of color, Krasnow rivaled Stanton Macdonald-Wright* who also devised daringly luminous spectral hues around which he built his compositions. Importantly, though, he avoided the hazy, transparent effects which characterized Macdonald-Wright*'s Synchromist work.

     "If his radiant coloration approached that of Macdonald-Wright*, Krasnow's biomorphic forms real an interest in primal sources which the Synchromist shunned. . . .

     "Krasnow's belief in archetypes was not exclusive to him but was shared by many artists of the 1940s, including Jackson Pollack . . .

     "As for Krasnow, those strains included the special feel of Southern California, which he expressed through glowing coloration. It is here in hs unusual palette that Krasnow's achievement resides, for his hues are at once sui generis and indicative of the stunning chromatics for which the region is known. Not only are his pigments distinctive, but they seem to emanate phosphorescent light. "Californa for color, American earth for form," exulted Kransow as he explained his intent to reify the brilliant light and sturdy foundation of Los Angeles.

     "At the same time that he praised his adopted city, Krasnow interacted guardedly with its art community. On the one hand he enjoyed social intercourse, and on the other he cherished his solitude, deeming privacy essential to his creative growth. Thus, during the 1940s and 1950s he limited personal ties to a small coterie that included art critics Jules Langsner and Frode Dann, novelist Irving Stone, artists June Wayne, Grace Clements, and Hilaire Hiler, sculptor Harold Gebhardt, musicians Fred and Frieda Fox and engineer-light artist Charles Dockum. Sequestering himself in his studio, he resisted subscriptions to magazines, rarely attended openings, and refused to join a gallery, believing that art was too sacrosanct to be subjected to the whims of the marketplace. Like Mark Rothko, he felt that art possessed a sanctity that demanded reverent care. Rather than compormise his values, he withdrew from commercial arena, showing his work in his studio and placing them with collectors who had earned his trust.

     "With his anti-materialistic bias Krasnow would appear to have been a prescient neo-Marxist. Certainly, his assumption of control over the exhibition and distribution of his works foreshadowed the alternative space impulse of the present day. Notwithstanding his refusal to be co-opted by the system, Krasnow was too much the idealist, too little the collectivist to enlist in any creed's camp. His visionary faith in art and his dogged independence precluded his involvement with communal enterprise.

     " . . .

     "Krasnow's early celebration of the region's plastic glitz foreshadowed the "Finish Fetish" of the 1960s, also known as the "L.A. Look." By joining high-keyed chromas to quirky figuration, Krasnow also prophesied the spunky subjectivity of the 1980s. Moreover, his focus on ethnic content at a time when it was viewed as retrograde paved the way for artists such as Ruth Weisberg*, Carlos Almarez and Frank Romero. In a similar way, his embrace of Hollywood's tinseled charm, which most artists chose to ignore cleared a path that Billy Al Bengston, Ed Ruscha, Joe Fay, Peter Alexander, and David Hockney would later pursue."

{Note the relationship to Tom Jenkin's* work.}

Knud Merrild (1894-1954), 1990, 1940s

     ". . . Born on the island of Jutland off the north shore of Denmark in 1894, Merrild decided in his youth to become an artist. At the age of fourteen he apprenticed himself to a housepainter, learning the skills of his trade while he studied art on his own. In 1913 after seeing a Cubist exhibit in Copenhagen, he converted to modernism and became its proselytizer. When he found his views unwelcome at the art schools where he was studying, he formed the Anvendt Kunst society in 1917, a group dedicated to the merger of fine arts and crafts.

     "In 1922 Merrild immigrated to America, believing that in this young industrious nation, modernism would take root. While in New York he established a friendship with Peter and Rose Krasnow and when they left for California later that year he followed suit. En route to the Pacific, he spent time as the guest of D.H. Lawrence and his wife Frida at their Taos, New Mexico ranch.

     "Merrild arrived in Los Angeles on 11 May 1923. . . . he worked as a housepainter . . .

     " . . . Between the 1920s and the 1950s his social orbit included artists Ejnar Hansen (a fellow Dane and partner in Merrild's painting business. Peter Krasnow, Lorser Feitelson, Grace Clements, and Man Ray, art critics Jules Langsner and Kenneth Ross, and collectors Ruth Maitland, Louis and Annette Kaufman, and Walter and Louise Arensberg who acquired several works by Merrild and hired him to paint their house. Merrild's fondness for literature, reinforced by his correspondence with Lawrence, led him to bookish coteries where he established ties with rare book dealer Jake Zeitlin and writers Dudley Nichols, Clifford Odets, Irving Stone, Henry Miller, and Aldous Huxley (who authored the preface in Merrild's memoirs of D. H. Lawrence.) Progressive in politics as well as in art, Merrild co-founded the Los Angeles branch of the American Artists Congress in 1936. . . . .

     " . . .

     "Merrild's involvement with Post-Surrealism led in the early 1940s into the realm of automatism. While exploring the subconscious, Merrild arrived at a novel, free-form technique which he termed "flux." As he described it, his flux technique consisted of pooling and dripping paint onto a wet surface and then angling the base board until the desired effects were achieved. Rejecting traditional palette knives and brushes, Merrild relied on the lesss conventional means of thrust and gravitational flow. With these tactics he brought into being what he poetically called his "automatic creation by natural law, a kinetic painting of the abstract.

     "Merrild valued his method of painting by "remote control" because it signified untrammeled existence and enabled him to capitalize on intuition. In its responsiveness to chance, Merrild felt that his technique was paradigmatic of life. His courting of chance allies him with Dada as does his oath of alligiance to Nature's fortuitous ways: "Everything seems to depend on the whim or law of chance, accidental judgement by accidental authority and forced cause. And by chance and accident we live or die. To reflect this I attempt a personal intuitive expression."{early 1940s}

     " . . .

     " . . . Merrild foreshadowed Pollock's progression from archetypal imagery to free-form abstraction, . . . and also predicted his use of housepainter's tools and enamels.

     [In the early 1950s, Merrild writes] "I am seeking art, perhaps, only to realize that it does not exist in itself. It exists only in the abstract, in different individuals' perceptions. Such perceptions must be deeply experienced and lived by, to keep it alive in its ever-changing flux, idea, belief, perception - all is flux . . ."

     [And again] "We can then start afresh to be transformed in the "flux' . . . To place oneself in the realm of flux affords joy and liberation . . . In the abstract we are of all things and of all mankind."

     " . . . Merrild . . . approached the unknown with enthusiasm and not . . . with existential angst.

     " . . ." p. 142

 

 

 (Back to Sources)

 

 

Kay Kyser and his Orchestra Fun with the Ol' Professor '44-'47, Sony (A-70229), Col-cd-7575 2003, 1947, 1940s

When Veronica Plays the Harmonica, Tommy Mack, Jimmy Mulcay, Mildred Mulcay, vocal by Gloria Wood, 1947

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

 

 Roger W. Lotchin The Bad City in the Good War, Indiana U. Press: 304 pages. Reviewed in the 17 August 2003 Sunday LA Times Book Review by Jonathan Kirsch, R2, 2003, 1960s 1943, 1940s

     " . . . allows us to see how the war effort shattered the status quo and revolutionized the sleepy world of prewar California.

     "'Separated by space, race, class, and occupational barriers, normally the aristocratic polo men, cowboys, and black soldiers had very little in common' . . . (But World War II was a) 'participatory conflict (and) 'their fear of totalitarianism united them in a greater effort.'

     "The melting pot . . . was specifically urban. 'Americans have traditionally been very skeptical of their cities and often downright hostile to them, but cities and city people would contribute markedly to the overthrow and containment of totalitarianism. The 'bad city' came in very handy in the 'Good War.'""

     ". . . California was quickly turned into a vast arms factory and a staging area for the war effort . . . a map . . . showing a dot for every aircraft plant in Los Angeles County is solid black at it center because of the sheer concentration of war production."

     "'Fortress California came of age in World War II . . .The overbuilt, overnight, jumped-up, 'improbable' California cities were an enormous asset to the American homefront.'"

     ". . .

     "The sheer congestion brought its own social and cultural reverberations as soldiers and sailors, factory workers and young locals encountered each other in the hectic setting of bars, ballrooms and clubs all over California. The Zoot Suit Riots of 1943 . . . were the result of a clash between military men on liberty in the streets of Los Angeles and the young men they encountered there . . . 'the best known 'recreational' event of the war . . . both sides were out to amuse themselves.'

     "Some of the gender and racial barriers that fell during World War II come as a surprise . . . the civil rights movement of the 1960s was rooted in World War II.

     ". . .

     "The author is careful not to overstate his case, insisting that the war ought to be regarded as a 'heroic interlude' rather than a revolution. Some of the forces of change already were at work before the war was over. . . 'Races met, mingled, settled in grudgingly or willingly, or skedaddled ' . . . 'No one knew quite what to make of this mix; yet all seemed to agree that it was upsetting, different, and fascinating.'"   

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

James W. Lunsford The Ocean and the Sunset, The Hills and the Clouds: Looking at Santa Monica, illustrated by Alice N. Lunsford, 1983, 1940s, 1930s

Ocean Park

     "3. Neilson Way. The former Trolleyway, it was originally a railroad right-of-way with tracks which was converted to street use in the '30s. It is named for George A. Neilson,* a city commissioner of the '30's and '40's and an Ocean Park resident."

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

 Eric Mankin Strategies: You Can Win City Hall, Mother Jones, VI, no. X, December, 1981, p. 66. 1981, 1940s

     "This is not a humble statement, certainly. Can it be a true one? A little social history is needed to help evaluate it, as Shearer* and Goldway* walk, holding hands, from city hall to a nearby restaurant, to make their argument. Forty years ago Santa Monica was a staid, Republican suburb, depicted by Raymond Chandler in his mysteries (under the name "Bay City") as a master repository of hypocritical suburban corruption, a place that could be bought whole, "box and tissue paper."

 

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Tom Moran and Tom Sewell Fantasy by the Sea Peace Press: Culver City, CA, 1980 (1979) (Originally published by Beyond Baroque Foundation with a grant from the Visual Arts Program of the National Endowment for the Arts), 1940s

Prelude to War

     "America was slowly seeing its way out of the Depression by 1942 . . .

[p. 81 black and white photo ; the WPA Edward Biberman's Venice Postoffice Abbot Kinney Mural]

     " . . .

     "Sewage from the Los Angeles outfall at Playa del Rey to the south had polluted the ocean water and signs along the Venice beach declared it off-limits to swimmers. . . ."

 

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Jenny Pirie*, Peter Kastner* and Jeff Mudrick* A Short History of Ocean Park, Ocean Park Community Organization, 1982, (With a 1983 update.) 15pp. 1983, 1982, 1940s, 1926,

     " . . . And the Second World War accelerated this change.

     "The war resulted in an unprecedented demand for airplanes from the Douglas Aircraft plant in Santa Monica, as well as increased production at all the support businesses in the area that served Douglas. Wartime workers flocked to the west side, and Ocean Park took in its share. Since there was little or no building during the war, existing housing had to take the strain. From being the "Unsurpassed All-Year Playground of the West" (as a 1926 advertisement described the town), Ocean Park was becoming an "all-year" home for working people and their families."

 

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Cecilia Rasmussen, L..A. Then and Now : A 'Carny Kid' Tells Students How He Beat the Odds, Los Angeles Times, May 1, 2005, B2. 1940s

 
    "[Kenny] Kahn* was born in Los Angeles in 1941. He spent his early childhood on the midway at Ocean Park Pier, one of the many names it bore, an amusement zone on a pier at the end of Ocean Park Boulevard in Santa Monica.
 
     "He writes that his father, Barry,* was a small-time carnival hustler who rigged pinball machines and games of chance. His mother, Faye,* danced the nights away to big-band music in local nightclubs and ballrooms around the pier.
 
     ""They each had their own interests, and being in any way good domestic parents was not on the agenda," Kahn* states.
 
     "When his brother Ricki* was born in 1944, Kahn, who was not quite 4, became the primary caregiver. He rarely saw his parents, who gave Kahn* instructions to "never wake them before 2 p.m…. I felt like strangling [Ricki*]," Kahn* writes.
 
     "He got out of baby-sitting when he started school in 1946. After school, he roamed the boardwalk, where he made friends and earned pocket change selling newspapers.
 
     "The pier suffered from neglect after World War II, and the customers who had been the elder Kahn*'s lifeblood soon left.
 
     "When Kenny* was 8, he writes, his mother went to jail for having sex with a minor and his father hit the road. Kenny* and Ricki* were sent to a foster home in Alhambra.
 
     "A year later, he writes, the parents retrieved the boys for a family summer business, what carnies called the "hankie-pank" games-rigged games-at county fairs in several states.
 
     "By 1952, Kenny* was earning $20 to $40 a day shortchanging customers at the dime-toss booth, according to his book. He'd also wax the plates to a sheen, making it virtually impossible for dimes to stick.
 
     "In 1954, the family-which by then included a heroin-addicted baby sister, Cookie*, he writes-was evicted for unpaid rent and other bills. They headed to Ramona Gardens, an Eastside public housing project.
 
     "Within weeks, their Lancaster Avenue apartment was a shooting gallery for neighborhood junkies.
 
     "The housing project was-and still is-nestled in a dell between a freeway and railroad tracks at the edge of Boyle Heights. Built in 1941, it was the first housing project in the city. Guns and hard drugs flooded in; staying alive became the definition of success."
" . . . "

 

 

(Back to Sources)  

 

 

Lionel Rolfe Literary L.A., Chronicle Books: San Francisco, 1981, 102pp., 1950s, 1941, 1940s, 1908

4. Thomas Mann: Faustus in the Palisades

     " . . . [1950s] . . .

     "My mother, Yaltah Menuhin, is a pianist, and she and Michael [Mann, son of Thomas Mann] had toured throughout Europe. . . .

     " . . .

     "Thomas Mann [and his wife, Katia, mother of Michael Mann] was the most famous of the many famous refugees from Hitler's Germany who sought out the untroubled blue skies over Los Angeles, so far away from the Holocaust in Europe. . . . Many of the greatest personalities, as well as egos, had come to L.A. to escape Hitler. Some were Jews, of course, but many, like Mann and Stravinsky, were not. Some were quite left-wing; others were conservative. . . . Yet they clung together . . .

     " . . . [Menuhin lived on Pelham Avenue]

     " . . . in the Pacific Palisades, . . . Mann lived at 1550 San Remo Drive.

     " . . . Arnold Schoenberg [and his wife, Gertrud] . . . in Brentwood, at 116 N. Rockingham.

     [A system for composing music is considered as unnatural.]

     "It is surely not coincidence that in 1908 Schoenberg wrote some music for poems by Stefan George for voice and piano. Schoenberg regarded this work as his great "breakthrough"-melody and harmony almost completely drowned out by atonality-and he he believed hat he had finally succeeded in his . . . claim of emancipating dissonance with his work. . . .

     "Like Schoenberg . . . George was a dedicated member of the so-called avant-garde, which was always searching for a "higher order." . . .

     " . . .

     " . . . Alma Mahler-Werfel, who had once been married to the composer Gustav Mahler . . . then remarried Franz Werfel, author of The Song of Bernadette, . . . is said to have pointed out the parallels to Arnold Schoenberg's music and career, in Thomas Mann's Dr. Faustus, to Arnold Schoenberg himself.

     Schoenberg . . . blamed musicologist and philosopher, Theodor Wisengrund-Adorno . . . who Mann had consulted . . .

      " . . . Mann was sixty-six when he came to Los Angeles in 1941 . . ."

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Andrea Schulte-Peevers and David Peevers Los Angeles, Lonely Planet: Oakland, 2nd ed., 1996(1999), 351pp., 1999, 1996, 1950s. 1940s. 1920s,

Painting & Sculpture

     "The Otis Art Institute, another important college that survives, also dates roughly to this time. Major Modernists from the '20s to the '40s included Jackson Pollack, Charles White, Man Ray, Eugene Berman*, Albert King and Oskar Fischinger. While many were thematically inspired by the California landscape and sunlight initially, by the '40s and '50s, attention turned to the materialism, consumerism and technological progress that characterized the era."

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Jeffrey Stanton Santa Monica Pier A History from 1875 to 1990, Donahue Publishing: Los Angeles, CA, 1990.
Santa Monica Pier on the Skids (1941-1974)

     " . . . Sunday, December 7, 1941 . . .

     "Sam Reed, the city's harbor master, . . . the following morning refused to allow several boatloads of Japanese fishermen to put to sea. The harbor had become home base to 46 mackeral fishing boats when naval activity in San Pedro caused them to relocate to Santa Monica. . . . [instructed by] the 11th Naval District Headquarters, he prohibited any boats from leaving the harbor and that afternoon a naval patrol was established . . .

     " . . . FBI arrested suspected [people] Fourty-five Japanese were arrested in Venice and West Los Angeles on Dec. 8th, and hundreds more the following day.

     "The harbor fog horn was mounted atop city hall . . . The city was blacked out at night . . . The first black out Dec. 11th at 9:50 p.m. . . . When neon signs and other lights continued to illuminate downtown buildings, angry citizens moved through the streets and smashed dozens of lights that had been left on when store owners closed for the day." p. 100

     "A citizen's defense militia was formed along the beach front to guard against possible infiltration by the enemy . . . Men and later women stood watch in four-hour shifts at fourteen stations strung along Santa Monica's waterfront. The beach, protected with barbed wire entanglements, was effectively closed during the day. . . .

     "The battery of the 3rd Battalion, 144th Field Artillery, was housed at the Municipal Auditorium in Ocean Park. Other army groups manning anti-aircraft batteries were set up at Clover Field to guard the camouflaged Douglas Aircraft plant that from the air resembled a suburban housing tract.

     ". . .

     "Santa Monica's mackerel fishing fleet resumed operation on May 11th under the Coast Gurad's new rules." . . . and with no Japanesee American fishermen . . .

     "By the summer most young men in the area between seventeen and thirty -five had either volunteered or were drafted into the armed services. But the piers and beaches still played host to thousands of soldiers on leave from nearby military bases and the cadre of defense workers at plants like Douglas Aircraft. Since most had never seen an ocean , the lifeguard service urged residents to publicize safety rules for beach visitors.

     "The area's normally brightly lit amusement piers were forced to curtail operations after dark because of dimout regulations. Santa Monica's pier, which had far fewer amusements, had less of a problem remaining open in the evening. Dance halls on Venice and Ocean Park piers offered one of the few forms of evening entertainment and were especially popular with swing-shift defense workers whose shift ended at midnight. By October the city passed laws . . ." forbidding people under eighteen from attending swing-shift dances and those between eighteen and twenty-one had to leave by 2 a.m.

     "Santa Monica's mackerel fleet was busy during the war providing food for the nation's war effort. In October 1942, a three ton weight limit was placed on pier vehicles due to a weakening structure. . .

     "A series of winter storms wrecked havoc on the fishing fleet . . . on January 14, 1943 . . . then seven inches of rain during a 56 hour storm in late January and forty eight boats washed ashore . . . and then the fish market crashed going from 21 c to 13 c per pound.

     "In February 1943, Security First National Bank sold the Santa Monica Pleasure Pier to Walter D. Newcomb, who was managing their pier under a lease agreement. Newcomb, who owned the pier's gift shop and arcade, had taken over management at the beginning of the war when Lt. Commander Harry E. Walker entered naval service.

     " . . . the city . . . assigned Newcomb the bank's twenty-one year franchise that began on June 7, 1936.

[Johnny "Tarzan" Weismuller was a frequent pier visitor and an honorary captain of Santa Monica's Municipal Lifeguard service and actually leaped from the pier to save a tiring swimmer, August 6, 1943.]

     "The city toughened its lease policy, limiting extent and cancelling leases that allowed alcohol sales. Olaf Olson had ben operating a cocktail bar, but had recently vacated the premises.

     " . . . the Santa Monica area became a rest and recovery area for returning soldiers and airmen. In late November, the Army began leasing the beach club hotels, first the Grand Hotel, Del Mar and Edgewater Clubs. Later they leased the Miramar, Ocean Palms and Shargri-La to quarter 1500 men returning from combat service. The beach club hotels operated like hotels rather than like an army base, and rotated about 2500 men per month through 14-21 day periods.

     "The La Monica Auditorium reopened in the spring of 1944 as the Palisades Dance Hall, considering its proximity to their hotels, it was only mildly popular with the visiting troops. Most soldiers preferred either Ocean Park's or Venice's more exciting amusement zones that offered roller coasters, fun houses, theaters, games of skill, and various spinning rides in addition to several dance halls. Santa Monica's Palisades Dance Hall closed several months later with . . . unpaid debts. When new management tried to reopen, the head of the National Musicians Union refused to sanction . . ."

     "Both Pacific Mutual Life Insurance's beach erosion lawsuit, better known as the Carpenter case, and Los Angeles Athletic Club's beach accretion lawsuit were retried in April 1944 by the U.S. District Court of Appeals. The court ruled in both cases against the plaintiffs and for the City of Santa Monica." p.101

     "The court found that the city was not responsible for either the erosion or sand accretion caused by the construction of the breakwater. It also ruled that the city had a legal right to protect its harbor and the property of others within its boundaries from the action of the ocean. In the Carpenter case it found that all the eroded beach in front of the Del Mar Club had been artificially created from 1875-1921 by man made structures in the Santa Monica Bay and that they belonged to the state and city, not the upland owner. Therefore it was state tidelands that had been damaged. . . .

     [The ruling was appealed to the California Supreme Court who refused to hear the appeals.]

     " . . .

     "Los Angeles County's Regional Planning Commission had much more ambitious plans for the ocean front along Santa Monica Bay. T.D. Cooke, their division engineer, unveiled plans on July 10, 1945, that called for the elimination of the Santa Monica Breakwater and all the amusement piers along the coast. . . ." p. 102

     " . . . Both Los Angeles City and County . . . insisted that all man-made sturctures. . . be removed because they interfered with the free movement of sand by the prevailing currents.

     "Finally, . . . commissioners W.W. Milliken and D.C. Freeman opposed the plan. . .

     "They would only support a plan that preserved the identity of Santa Monica's waterfront . . .

     "In response to a proposal for even further development north of the pier, protests included Morton Anderson who was the Santa Monica member of the State Shoreline Planning association. who said that to permit a carnival construction on the beach would be a "return to the horse and buggy days and would wreck Santa Monica's development as a leading resort city."

     " . . ." p. 103

     " The city . . . placed deputy city clerk Ralph Kruger in charge of all Municipal Pier leases in February 1946. He instituted new lease procedures that put expired leases out to public bid. The first was the Porthole Cafe . . . Then when Bay Fish Market . . . the Commissioners out of a sense of fairness overruled him and extended the lease until those of California Seafood and Santa Monica Seafood companies lapsed.

     " . . .

     "Beach activities were beginning to return to normal during the spring. The Army vacated all the hotels and beach clubs . . . and those that were owned by insurance companies were sold to private investors. . . . The Del Mar Club reopened in June and both the Grand and Edgewater Hotels remodeled in time for summer reopenings as a tourist hotel and beach club respectively.

     "Santa Monica scheduled its first annual Santa Monica Fiesta at the Municipal Pier . . .Hundreds of thousands . . . while fifty combat aircraft from Alamitos Bay Naval Air Station . . .

     "Foremost was the bathing beauty contest to crown Miss Santa Monica. Leo Carillo, a noted Santa Monica actor was the master of ceremonies. Judges, mostly from MGM Studios, judged the thirty eight contestants and crowned eigthteen year old Mary Joe Devlin . . . . Governor Earl Warren presented her with the trophy.

     "The Monoa Paddleboard Club opened their show with a fifteen girl paddleboard ballet, then held races and an exhibiiton polo paddleboard contest in the calm waters north of the pier . . .

     "Acrobatic and gymnastic exhibitions were featured at the playground several hundred feet south of the pier. This area that had become known as "Muscle Beach" was built in th early 30's as a Works Progress Administration "time-killer". The WPA built a weight lifting platform to provide work and recreation facilities for the crowds of unemployed and relief recipients who had nothing to do during the Depression. It was eventually taken over by the Santa Monica Recreation Department after the original users found jobs and moved on.

     "These exhibitions, that were usually held on Memorial Day weekends since 1935, featured weight lifters, gymnasts, balancers, muscle control artists, and tumblers. some of the better known performers included Wayne Long, Glen "Whitey" Sunby, Pudgy Stockton "queen of the barbells" and Beverly Jochner who was known as the strongest girl in America. She could lift three people weighing 350 pounds overhead. Russ Sanders, the gymnastic coach would fill out the program with high school and college athletes. The Fiesta, however, marked the first time that they had staged a men's physique competition for the title of Mr. Santa Monica.

     'Business on the Newcomb Pier increased during the first postwar summer. Band leader Spade Cooley rented the La Monica Ballroom and his style of country-western music attracted large evening crowds. Then business was also helped somewhat by the elimination of the competing Venice Amusement Pier. It had been forcibly closed down in the spring when the Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation refused to renew the Kinney Company's tideland's lease. The closing, however, deprived Walter Newcomb of much of the income that he needed to remodel his[the Santa Monica] aging pier and turn it into a modern tourist attraction. He had operated the merry-go-round and the popular Venice Fun House on the condemned pier.

     "While Newcomb was preoccupied with removing his attractions from the Venice Pier, he found a buyer for his Parker carousel located in the Hippodrome building. He then moved his 1922 Philadelphia Toboggan carousel, PTC #62 from the Venice Pier into the building. He had purchased the carousel before the war for $25,000 from an amusement park in Nashville, Tennessee.

     "The new carousel opened on June 27, 1947 after a two month long renovation by famed carousel builder, Rudy Illions. It was a fifty foot diameter, three abreast machine with two chariots and forty-four horses hand carved by John Zaler. It was illuminated by 750 electric lights and had a Wurlitzer band organ that played from punched rolls of carousel music. Robert Newcomb, Walter's brother, became manager of the ride.

     " . . .

     " . . . Myer Simon, president of the California Seafood Company . . .

     " . . . the city's second annual beauty pageant in 1947 was staged almost two weeks before the Independence Day festivities. It began with a mile long parade from the Santa Monica Pier to Ocean Park's Casino Gardens. A crowd of 100,000 watched eighty horseback riders, numerous movie stars in parade vehicles, and two bands march past. Spade Cooley, radio western star, acted as Grand Marshal for the event. A panel of movie celebrities judged Susan Brown as the city's . . ." p. 105

     "The Independence Day celebration at the pier was just a shadow of the previous year's festival. The Recreation Department staged its 2nd Annual Muscle Matinee on July 4th. A crowd of several thousand watched Charles B. Grayling, a 24 year old studio technician, win the title Mr. Santa Monica. . . .

     "The Labor Day contest for the Miss Muscle Beach title was much more exciting and included a show by Pudgy Stockton's Beachettes and a Thrill Circus featuring outstanding Pacific Coast athletes. A sweating, yelling, whistling, hot dog munching, soda pop drinking mob of sun-burned men, women and their children gathered to 'ooh' and 'ah' at the nearly three dozen shapely contestants. The pageant was supposed to prove that a woman could pour beauty and biceps into the same bathing suit. Mirs. Vivian Crockett, a 22 year old housewife and free lance actress won the title.

     "On September 3rd, the State Board of Health quarantined twelve miles of beaches from the Santa Monica Pier south to Hermosa Beach. This left Santa Monica with only 1.7 miles off swimming beach. The problem once again was Los Angeles' antiquated Hyperion Sewage Plant which had run out of chlorine again and was dumping large amounts of untreated swewage int the bay. While Santa Monica and Ocean Park's beaches reopened the following summer, Venice's beaches remained closed until the new Hyperion Sewage Plant began operation in June 1950.

     " . . . .

     " . . . City Manager Randall Dorton . . . " p.106

     "Santa Monica's harbor finally received official recognition as a government approved small craft harbor on January 31, 1949. It's approval by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and 11 District Coast Guard entailed no administrative changes . . .

     ". . .

     "Santa Monica officials went to Sacramento and appeared before the State Parks Commisssion to ask for the remaining $255,000 of the $325,000 dredging fund that was set up in 1943. Thye planned to move the sand southward and widen the beach by 370 feet between the Santa Monica and Ocean Park Piers. State officials finally approved the plan on April 29, 1949.

     "Six months later the federal government approved the breakwater as a barrier to curb erosion of the north beaches with the understanding that the city maintain periodic harbor dredging to replenish its south beaches. . . ."

     "Spade Cooley* "King of Western Swing" and his country-western dance band, which performed in the La Monica Ballroom on weekend evenings, had grown to enormous popularity. KTLA, Channel 5, began broadcasting the band in 1948 on Saturday night at 8 p.m. and by 1950 the show was the second most popular Los Angeles television program."p. 111

     " . . . Eventually he formed his own band and his "barn dance' style entertainment caught on during the war."

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Jeffrey Stanton Venice of America: 'Coney Island of the Pacific,' Donahue Publishing: Los Angeles, CA, 1987. 176 pp., 1950, 1948, 1947, 1946, 1945, 1943, 1941

     "America prepared for war in 1941. The draft was enacted and nearly 200 local youth were serving in the armed forces when hostilities broke out on December 7, 1941. . . .

     "A blackout was immediately instituted, and National Guardsmen patrolled the beach. Helmeted air raid wardens took their duties seriously as they inspected their blocks nightly for any stray shaft of light that might become a beacon for enemy warships and subs. The Douglas Aircraft factory was completely camouflaged so that it looked like a harmless housing tract from the air.

     "The amusement piers were open thorough out the war except at night. Soldiers and sailors came to the piers and boardwalk on weekend leaves. . . .

     "Dancing was a favorite way to meet local girls. Harry James and Benny Goodman played swing music at the Casino Gardens on the Ocean Park Pier. The Venice Dance Hall offered country and western music by the best bands in the west.

     "By 1943, threats of invasion had diminished sufficiently to permit near normal operation of the amusement zone during the evening hours. The piers were also a haven for young Mexican-Americans who adopted a style of dress distinctly their own. The boys wore ducktail haircuts, flat pancake hats, peg-top trousers, reet pleats, long glittering watch chains and long drape coats. The girls, dubbed 'cholitas' wore tight fitting sweaters and black hobble skirts that stopped above the knee line. Going out in your best attire was called 'zooting'.

     "It was inevitable that tension would develop between the 'zoot suiters' and the servicemen that congregated at the piers on weekend nights. On the night of May 8, 1943 rumors circulated along the beach that one of the 'zoot-suiters' had knifed a sailor and a clash began. Several hundred soldiers, sailors and local teenagers ran the Mexican-Americans out of the Aragon Ballroom on the Lick Pier. They clashed again after midnight along Ocean Front Walk at Navy Street in front of a crowd of 2500 spectators. Thirteen 'zoot-suiters' were arrested and 28 more were taken into custody following the battle.

     " . . .

     "The stage was set for another round of fighting the following weekend. Police roadblocks intercepted over a hundred 'zoot-suiters' bound for Venice, and arrested eight local youths who were discovered carrying concealed weapons. It ended the Venice wars but the clashes soon moved to downtown Los Angeles where worse racial violence took place.

     "The war years weren't very good for Venice. In 1943 the California State Board of Health quarantined the beach as far north as Brooks Avenue because Los Angeles was dumping raw sewage into Santa Monica Bay. {Lifted in 1950.} . . ..

     "The war ended on August 14, 1945. . . . ' p. 138

Chapter 7: Dismantling of Venice (1946-1972)

     ". . .

     ". . . the [Venice] pier closed at midnight on Saturday April 20, 1946." p. 139

     "The beach widening project begun in 1947 resulted in the sluicing of over 14 million tons of sand from the dune site of the proposed Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant in El Segundo to as far north as the Ocean Park Pier. The width of the beach along the eight mile stretch was increased to a uniform 500 feet. But the summer of 1948 sluicing progressed as far as Brooks Avenue. It was strange to see the Sunset Pier completely landlocked, the beach stretching far beyond its outer pilings. The project, including the sewage plant, was completed in 1950. The beach quarantine was lifted the following year."

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Kevin Starr Embattled Dreams California in War and Peace 1940-1950, Oxford University Press, 2002, 386 pp., 2002, 1940, 1912,

     [p. 97, 1943] Los Angeles, in short, was a Jim Crow town in which numerous nobodies-failures, drifters, downwardly mobile Folks, those expellled from their previous communities-had one thing and only one thing going for them, either con-[p. 97, 1943]sciously or subconsciously; they were white. As racial hatred against the Japanese surfaced into respectability-indeed, became a vehement proof of patriotism-such Los Angelenos began to identify their whiteness with America itself, and with the war effort.

     [p. 98, 1943] With the Japanese removed into camps, Mexicans provided the next obvious target for racial hatred . . . Among the many charges leveled by whites against Mexicans was their alleged proclivity for violence. Captain Edward Duran Ayres, chief of the Foreign Relations Bureau in the office of the sheriff of Los Angeles County, spoke for many white Southern Californians in a 1942 report to the county grand jury: Mexicans were descended from Indians, Orientals, with Mongolian tendencies to violence . . . resorting to knives or lethal weapons rather than the fists of Anglo-Saxon youths . . .

     [p. 98. 1943] Once again, the racism of California caused international embarrassment, since Mexico was an ally of the U.S, against the Axis . . . American liberals . . . drew obvious comparisons to the anti-Semitism of the Nazis.

     [p. 98, 1942] On the other hand . . . A significant percentage of the officers of the Los Angeles Police and Sheriff's Department agreed with Ayres. For many years, in fact, the LAPD and the sheriff's department had been making war on young men of Mexican descent in the belief that such young men were by definition criminal in fact and intent. . . young Mexican men found themselves hauled into jail for seventy-two hours on mere suspicicon, then released. Beatings were frequent, as were frameups . . An [p. 99, 1943] impressive number of young Mexican men wre shot dead in the streets by trigger-happy officers. No white police or sheriff's deputies in the Deep South of the period kept the local population under a more intense level of intimidation through violence.

     [p. 99, 1943] Central to this perception of the young Mexican-American as violent gang member were the pachuco and pachuca and the zoot suiter. Not every pachuco was a zoot suiter (pachucas had their own stylized attire), and not every zoot suiter was a pachuco. Evolving in the barrios of Los Angeles, pachuquismo represented a more fundamental condition than the mere wearing of a zoot suit. . . . The pachuco was a young male Mexican-American caught between two worlds and belonging to neither . . . the pachuco was in a condition of generalized revolt born of alienation. . . . the pachuco retreated into a stance of defiant isolation broken only by loyalties to other pachuco in associations invariably seen by the police as criminal gangs. Interestingly enough, given the deracination of the pachuco in American society, the pachuca was reaching back into Spanish tradition for the creation of his argot: an idiosyncratic blend of Calo (the perennial language fo the underground and underworld, having its origins in medieval Spain), gypsy, Ladino (Iberian-Hebrew), Mexican tough-guy talk, jive, Angleicized Spanish and Hispanic - cised English, together weith numerous linguistic terms of strictly Los Angeles coinage. Pachuquismo also brought to Los Angeles its own ballad tradition, the ballads being mainly about the Los Angeles Police Department beating pachuco heads. Pachucos were gtiven to tatoos-crosses, mainly, sumounted by initials-which the Los Angele press invested with near-cabalistic significance.

     [p. 99, 1943] Pachuquismo represented a defiant response on the part of many young men who belonged to neither Mexico nor the United States . . . From the perspective of white Los Angeles, the pachuco was its worst nightmare come true: The avenging Mexican-dark, fierce-eyed, Indian, bent on violence and revenge.

     The pachuca expressed more style than revolt. She was, in fact, little more than a Mexican-Anerican version of the Anglo-American V-girls who had emerged by 1943 as a social type in the American city. Like the V-girl, the pachuca featured a stylized version of popular dress: saddle shoes, bobby socks, skirts at or above, the knee, sheer blouses, cardigan sweaters, heavy lipstick, drawn square above the lip . . .

     [p. 101] . . . In 1942, the Los Angeles Police, the Los Angeles Courts, the Los Angeles Ruling Oligarchy, the Los Angeles newspapers committed, "the most egregious persecution of Mexican-Americans in the history of American criminal courts-the mass arrest, trial and conviction of the Sleepy Lagoon defendents" . . .

The Sleepy Lagoon Incident (Auig. 1, 1942). . .

     [p. 103, 1942] University of Southern California historian and psychoanalyst, Mauricio Mazon: "Only a community in a form of trance could have sustained such mass indictments on such non-existent evidence and the phantasmagoric trial that followed."

     [p. 103, 1942] The Sleepy Lagoon Defense Committee was chaired by the California Housing and Immigration Commissioner Carey McWilliams, "a brilliant voice and prolific pen on the left (and the single finest non-fiction writer on California-ever)", included Orson Welles and Hollywood screenwriter Guy Endore . . .

     [p. 104, 1942] . . . On 10 August 1942 . . . a dragnet organized by the LAPD, the sheriff's office, and the California Highway Patrol swept through Los Angeles County and arrested more than six hundred Mexican American men on a variety of trumped-up charges . . .

     " . . .

     [p. 112] "During the Second World War, more than seven hundred thousand African-[p. 113] American moved into industrial cities seeking employment in defense industries. Some 150,000 of them moved to the Pacific Coast, mainly to Los Angeles County and the San Francisco Bay Area. Shipbuilding proved a magnet . . . At the outbreak of the war, fully half of all defense jobs were either overtly or covertly closed to African-Americans. Two powerful unions, the International Association of Machinists and the Boilermakers Union, which together represented 20 percent of all shipyard workers, excluded blacks from union membership or admitted them only to segregated locals with no right to vote in industry wide negotiations.

     [p. 112] "On 28 June 1941 Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed Executive Order 8802, mandating fair employment practices in all war industries and the situation slowly improved . . .

     "[Differnent observers indicated the deep social distrust and prejudices of every group toward every other . . . including Women, Okies and Jews . . .

     [p. 115] "At the bottom of the shipyard pecking order were African-Americans."

     [p. 118] In 1943, black recruits were entering a segregated Army. Not until 1947 would the armed forces of the United States be desegregated. During the war, African-Americans, while segregated found their best opportunities in the Army Air Force and in certain Army ground units. The Navy assigned blacks almost exclusively to steward duties or to stevedore work in labor divisions . . .

     [p. 119] Port Chicago, north of San Francisco, was where the black stevedores loaded the U.S. Navy's ammunition.

     [p. 119] On the night of Monday, 17 July 1944, shortly after 10 o'clock, Port Chicago exploded, expending the energy equivalent of the Hiroshima atomic bomb, killing 320 men and injuring another 390. Workers refused to return to work leading to court martial proceedings. NAACP attorney, Thurgood Marshall, "This is not fifty men on trial for mutiny. This is the Navy on trial for its whole vicious policy towards Negros. Negroes are not afraid of anything anymore than anyone else. Negroes in the Navy don't mind loading ammunition. They just want to know why they are the only ones doing the loading!" It wasn't until after the war that the military convictions were reversed.

     [p. 121] Mexican-American soldiers, by contrast, were not segregated . . . Nearly half a million Mexican-American young men served in the armed forces during World War II, despite the fact that the Mexican-Americans constituted less than 3 percent of the nations's population . . .

     [p. 121] . . . Mexican-Americans constituted the most highly decorated ethnic group in the Second World War. Because young Mexican-Americans tended to gravitate to elite combat units, there were proportionately more Spanish surnamed casualties . . . Mexican-American young men were especially fond of the paratroops. . .

     [p. 122] ' . . . Mexican-Americans liked the special uniform worn by airborne troops. It reminded them of a zoot suit. By 1944 the hated zoot suit and pachuca style of 1943 had made their way into mainstream feminine fashion. Heavily padded shoulders, sharp lapels, single-button jackets, knee-length pleated skirts, high pompadours, a blotch of lipstick above the upper lip: by 1944 the Andrew Sisters and millions of other young women had adapted a stylized version of the attire. On 13 June 1943 the Los Angeles City Council had passed an ordinance prohibiting the wearing of zoot suits within the city limits, classifying it as a misdemeanor. There is no record of the City Council or the LAPD having served a warrant of any kind on the Andrew Sisters.

 

[p. 123] Chapter 5 1944 Swing Shift

 [p. 123] . . . bells and sirens of the Douglas plant in Santa Monica shrieked . . . The day shift followed by the swing shift. All over Los Angeles County at approximately the same time-at Douglas, Lockheed, Vega, Northrop, North American, Convair at approximately the same time . . . After Pearl Harbor, all six Los Angeles County aviation plants accelerated into a three-shift, around-the-clock schedule that yielded an immediate 30 percent increase in productivity. By early 1944, the height of wartime production, most aviation plants were supporting three eight-hour, or the equivalent, shifts.

     . . . By 1944 more than 230,000 men and women were at work in aviation in Los Angeles County . . . [in Life magazine photos] the departure of the day shift and the arrival of the swing shift-Few workers were carrying lunch pails . . . for most aviation plants provided a low-cost, highly subsidized cafeteria service.

     " . . . [Swing shift activities] . . . [p. 124] Life magazine photos: workers dancing to the Douglas Welfare Band. At Douglas and Northrop, the workers themselves organized and produced a minstrel show. . . .

     [p. 124] "Were these wartime factories . . . or were these scenes from an industrial utopia, a social democratic experiment more suitable to Scandinavia than to the laissez-faire United States? [There were also . . . ] a full range of social benefits afforded aviation workers.

     "Aviation plants maintained an extensive program of industrial medicine, with an integrated system of emergency clinics and preventive health programs, including short-term psychological counseling for those experiencing difficulties in the working place or, more tragically, those who had suddenly lost a loved one to the war. Each worker received a health code number, which indicated handicaps, deficiencies, and job descriptions. Thousands of the handicapped, moreover, had found work. The hearing-impaired were assigned to the noisiest tasks and departments. The sightless proved especially skilled at hand-assembly, and seeing-eye dogs became a common presence in aircraft factories. Management also facilitated the countless tasks of day-to-day life-banking, postal services, car registration, optometry and dental care, payment of telephone and utility bills-by setting up kiosks and other service centers adjacent to assembly lines.

     "Rather than have workers bring their lunches, always a difficulty in a rationed economy, or leave the premises to eat, which wasted time and money, aircraft companies maintained a highly subsidized program of on-site food service. In February 1944 the Lockheed plant in Burbank unveiled its new cafeteria, the largest in the world, capable of serving sixty thousand meals a day, six days a week. Designed by the distinguished Los Angeles firm of John and Donald Parkinson (Bullock's Wilshire, City Hall, the Union Station), the Lockheed cafeteria covered an entire city block . . . Up to seventeen thousand workers could be seated at a time . . . Another thirty-six thousand hot meals were rushed each day to twenty-two canteen locations in outlying Lockheed factories. At North American, fifty cents dropped into a turnstile entitled a worker to eat all he or she wanted from an ample menu. The Douglas plant in Santa Monica provided free Eskimo Pie ice creams, twelve thousand of them daily, at break time. Not only were such food service programs a boost to morale and efficiency, they also ensured that [p. 125] workers enjoyed a standard of nutrition essential to their health in the rationed wartime economy . . . [Starr reminds us of the slave labor used by the Axis governments.]

     [p. 125] . . . Getting to work . . . In 1944 more than a hundred thousand Los Angeles County defense workers were commuting more than fifty miles each day . . . Douglas, Lockheed, and North American each established their own bus system . . .

     [p. 125] Extensive day-care . . . the Aircraft War Production Council by 1944 had established 126 nursery centers, accomodating more than 4000 children, and another 118 day-care centers [with] an average of 3,300 children.

     " . . . The introduction of women into the work force . . . came not as a matter of conscience or social equity but as one of necessity.

     " . . . [The Aircraft Industry competed with the US Military for personel, workers, engineers . . .] p. 126]

     [p. 126] "To counter such losses to the draft, aircraft companies launched a nationwide recruitment of draft-exempt or draft-deferred family men, relocating entire families to Los Angeles. Locally employed professionals and other draft-exempt men were encouraged to work part-time shifts in aviation as a patriotic contribution. Policemen, firemen, and servicemen stationed in the vicinity were also integrated into the industry at the rate of a shift or two per week. Age barriers were dropped, especially for veterans; and thousands of World War I, even Spanish-American War, veterans worked full or part-time on the assembly line. Working with local boards of education, aircraft companies devised programs that would allow high school students over the age of sixteen to work a half-day shift, making up class time on Saturdays. In many cases, such programs were coordinated with technical instruction in the high schools to create a comprehensive apprenticeship program. More than four thousand young men of high school age, including nearly the entire football team from Burbank High School, were at work at Lockheed by the summer of 1943. All in all, some seventy-seven Southern California high schools participated in such work-study programs, which were in and of themselves notable achievemenjts in industrial culture.

     [p. 126] It was not enough. . . . "By January 1942, personnel officials at Douglas, . . . announced that women would eventually constitue one third of the total Douglas work force. That figure was reached within months. By July 1943, some 113,028 women were on the job; 42.4 percent of the total work force in Southern California aviation. . . .

     [p. 126] "For a few brief years, it seemed as if a major revolution were occurring [p. 127] in American industry. Never before in the history of American industry had so many women worked side by side with so many men of comparable levels of working conditions, wages and skills. . . .

     [p. 127] "With some adjustments by the women to the technology (and some adjustments of the technology to the women), females made excellent assembly line workers. Lockheed retained the services of a female physician, Dr. Marion Dakin, to work at vaious tasks in the line into which women were being introduced . Dakin analyzed these tasks, then made specific recommendations regarding adjustments and retooling based upon average female heights, weights and body strengths. Women workers at Vultee developed a "lazy arm" to move heavy tools, which soon became standard throughout the industry. A true revolution was at work, anthropologist Margaret Mead believed, with young women coming into Los Angeles on their own, getting jobs in the defense industry on their own, experiencing anonymity and mobility on their own, in contrast to the restrictions of their previous environments. The revolution extended to the male-female relationship as well . . .

     [p. 128] " . . .

      "Anxieties over sexuality in the workplace surfaced most intensely in 1942 as more and more woment joined the line. Douglas Aircraft, for example, ran a major article on gonorrhea and syphilis in the company newspaper at the same time that women began to come into its plants in significant numbers. Only one such story ran. Personnel managers at Vultee were so disturbed by the problem of sexuality in the workplace that personnel officers were instructed not to hire overly attractive young women . . . Personnel officers wre also wary of hiring high-strung, blue-blooded Katarine Hepburn types or arty bohemians.

     [p. 128] "By and large, women in both the aircraft and shipbuilding industries wre women of the blue-collar and middle-classes: high school graduates, not college co-eds; the wives, sweethearts, and sisters of enlisted men, for whom war work represented . . . a step up in the world.

     " . . .

     [p. 129] "While reports of sexual activity in the holds of ships . . . were greatly exaggerated . . . on-the-job sexual activity in the aviation industry seems more extensive and better documented. Civil defense shelters seemed especially convenient. Lockheed had a constant problem with amorous couples using its bomb shelters for lovemaking on the lunch break; management requested that employees refrain from leaving garments and discarded condoms on the floor. Despite state and federal requirements that air raid shelters had to be kept accessible, management at the Douglas plant in Santa Monica closed off its civil defense shelters with heavy tar paper because too many couples were repairing there for lunchtime trysts. On the home front, the Second World War was, in general, a sexually intense, venturesome. and unstable time, a situation made even more compelling in the aircraft factories of Southern California by the increasing presence of young and attractive women and the decreasing presence of available men.

     [p. 129] "Many attractive young women flocked to the aircraft industry in Los Angeles County from around the nation with the hope of eventually getting into the movies, in fact, that a new type emerged combining the attributes of a defense worker and a starlet . . . The Hollywood Guild, which ran the Hollywood Canteen, recruited young women from Lockheed to act as dance hostesses at the Canteen after the swing shift. Formally [p. 130] designated the Blue Stars, the young women would work an eight-hour shift, get off at midnight, then dance with servicemen at the Hollywood Canteen until three in the morning. At North American, some five hundred young women volunteered as dance hostesses for nearby Army Air Force training detachments.

     [p. 130] " . . .

     [Starr tells a pretty story about Norma Jean's success as a production worker, who studied to be a model, who then modeled for the Douglas Aircraft Co., a glamourous aviation worker. A career path for Marilyn Monroe.]

     [The Aviation Industry seemed to follow directly the history and contibution of . . .]

 

      [p. 133] " . . . the [aeronautical] companies of Southern California possessed the mass and the depth necessary for large-scale production. By 1937 Southern California had surpassed New York, meaning Long Island, as the leading center of aircraft manufacture, and the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena had become the leading center of aeronautical research and teaching in the nation. In early 1938 General H.H. (Hap) Arnold, chief of staff of the Army Air Corps, met with Southern California companies and discussed the probability of a major gearing-up of the industry. Already, a number of companies were expanding to fill British orders. On 23 June 1938, for example, the British Purchasing Commission headed by Arthur Purvis placed a $25 million order for planes from Lockheed. Within the next three years, the British had a total of $34 million in orders with Northrop alone. By the summer of 1940, Douglas Aircraft had so much business, a backlog of nearly $140 millions in orders, it was forced to inaugurate a three-shift, aroud [p. 134]-the-clock schedule . . .

  [p. 134] . . . In May 1940 President Roosevelt called for the aircraft industry to gear up to produce fifty thousand planes a year. No one knows where Roosevelt got this figure . . . By Pearl Harbor 113,000 men and women were at work in the aircraft indutry in Los Angeles County, up from 13,000 in January 1939. Taken together, the six Los Angeles County-based aviation companies were soon to surpass citrus and motion pictures as the leading industry of the region. [What happened to oil? KR] . . .

     [p. 134] . . . "In March 1941 Fortune described the industry as "an arsenal next door to Hollywood, in a Southern California atmosphere of orange groves, neon signs, movie stars, race tracks, chiropractors, leg art, radio studios, and pension movements." "They are making dive bombers in the Land of Oz." By 1942 . . . Aviation had replaced the film industry as the important action in the Southland. Douglas Aircraft, said Life on 12 October 1942, employed more people than all the Hollywood studios put together [while still] showing the same eclectic mix of people as the Hollywood studios (the pretty girls hoping to be starlets, the merely star struck, the Folks for the Midwest, the anonymous people who had left behind other lives; one aircraft company reported that there were enough trained musicians in its employ to form two orchestras. There were free bands at noon, and fashion shows with local models . . .

     [p. 134] If aircraft had replaced film in local chic, then the heads of the aviation companies became the new producers, and the aviation factory replaced the film studio as the preeminent industrial structure . . .[p. 135] Gigantic plants such as the Douglas plant in Santa Monica and the Convair plant in San Diego were cities unto themselves, incorporating the full spectrum of urban functions-fire, police (with 162 officers, Douglas had the sixth largest police department in California), transportation, branch city halls, lending libraries, voting booths. While the major film studios had achieved impressive levels of social organization by the late 1930s, the size and social intricacy of the aircraft plants represented a quantum leap in comparison.

     [p.135] "Like the Hollywood studios, moreover, aviation plants while industrial did not seem so. [They exuded an atmosphere of skilled production and technolgy. They were extremely well-lit. They were glamorous.] Aviation plants employed Hollywood set designers to camouflage their facilities from possible air attack. Set artists devised cunning color patterns to integrate plants in agricultural areas into the surrounding landscape. In the case of the Douglas plant in Santa Monica, a replica of an entire Santa Monica neighborhood, complete with mock houses and cars, was spread across the roof. . . .

     [p. 135] "A photograph in Life for 12 October 1942 showed the all-male members of the Aircraft Production Council in session. Growing out of informal pre-war talks hosted twice a month by Donald Douglas at his Santa Monica plant, the council coordinated the aircraft industry in the Southern California region. Briefly, in January 1942, Washington had been contemplating the appointment of an aircraft czar to coordinate the entire industry; but West Coast aviation leaders had balked, pointing out that they already were accustomed to cooperating and sharing ideas. Obviously, such an emergency wartime council suspended just about all anti-trust provisions of American law and created what was in effect a coordinated industrial [p. 136] policy operating through a temporary instance of capitalist-syndicalism parallel to those of Germany and Japan. Under the guidance of the Aircraft War Production Council, Southern California aviation incorporated liberal and conservative elements in its structure and operations. On the one hand, it was an industrial cartel, but then again: it was government-sponsored. In terms of its employee relations and benefits, it was a planned social democratic utopia.

     . . .

     [p. 138] ". . . By Pearl Harbor, Lockheed had fifty-four thousand employees, which grew to ninety thousand by 1944, making it the single largest employer in Los Angeles County.

     [p. 138] Lockheed was also the most progressive of the aviation companies. Many of th employee polices and services that made Southern California aviation seem an industrial utopia-transportation, food service, counseling, day care, medical, banking, and public utility services, on-site optometry and dental care-first appeared at Lockheed. As a boost to employee morale, Lockheed went so far as to persuade the city of Burbank to rescind an ordinance prohibiting dancing on Sunday. Lockheed welcomed women into its work force and rather early in the war hired 150 sight-impaired workers and five hundred other phyysically challenged employees.

     Southern California aviation was initially a white person's game. As of June 1941 [p. 139] there were only four . . . African American production workers on the assembly line in all of Southern California aviation. In its March 1941 article, Fortune noted the overwhelming whitness-indeed, the Anglo-Saxon blondness-of Los Angeles aircraft workers, so many of them Old English stock of Appalachia via the Dust Bowl . . . Fortune also suggested that anit-Semitism was rampant in the industry, especially among management who perceived Jews as having radical, which is to say, unionizing, tendencies. Shortly after Pearl Harbor, Cerard Tuttle of Vultee openly confessed in a letter to the National Negro Congress that his company hired only workers of the Caucasion race. In June 1941 President Roosevelt had issued Executive Ortder 8802 establishing a Committee on Fair Employment Practices in an effort to protect the rights of black Americans seeking work in the defense industry. Eighteen months later, Northrop was still hiring no African-Americans.

     Lockheed and Douglas pursued a different policy. By the end of 1942, Douglas was employing 1,800 black workers. By the end of the war, African-Americans filled 4.5 percent of all jobs at Douglas. Lockheed ran special bus lines into black neighborhoods to bring workers to its Burbank plant. When the one hundredth black worker was hired at Lockheed, the company brought in heavyweight champion Joe Louis, then a sergeant in the Army, to welcome him onto the line. Lockheed public relations made much of the fact that relatives of such black celebrities as Jackie Robinson and Jesse Owens were with the company. Lockheed also supported the construction of an African-American-oriented YMCA in Burbank. In the summer of 1942 Lockheed placee the first black female on the production line. By 1943 Lockheed was employing some three thousand African-American workers. Even such progressive companies as Lockheed and Douglas, however, initially maintained all-black sports teams, canteens, choral groups, and dances, although segregation tended to break down as the war progressed.

     In further testimony to its social democratic progressivism, Lockheed maintained excellent relations with its unions before and during the war. Remarkably, the United States did not require a labor draft during World War II. All labor needs rather were met on a voluntary basis. On the other hand, the question of union representation and such union sanctions as the strike became espeicially controversial in wartime. Nowhere was this more true than in Southern California, the most unorganized region outside the South for a variety of reasons: the mobility of a population comprised of strangers from elsewhere, hence lacking group identity; the fluidity of social and economic conditions, in which few Southern Californians saw themselves as permanently fixed in any one or another class or occupation; the lack of heavy industry, in which union organization was the norm; and, perhaps most important, the effective organization against unions by the ol- [p. 140] igarchy, led by the fiercely anti-union Los Angeles Times and the Los Angeles County Chamber of Commerce, which repeatedly outmaneuvered whatever union sentiment mangaged to coalesce.

     [p. 140] The war changed this, bringing the union movement to a previously impregnable fortress of the open shop. By late 1944, Fortune was reporting that Los Angeles could no longer be considered a predominantly open-shop city. The Teamsters, for one thing, had forty thousand members in Los Angeles County alone. The CIO had organized the waterfront and gained a foothold in oil and the garment industry. [The major breakthrough was centered in the aircraft industry, between Pearl Harbor and V-J Day.]

     Two unions vied for power in the aircraft industry: the International Association of Machinists (an AFL union) and the United Auto Workers (of the CIO) . . . The CIO union also possessed a more encompassing attitude toward women and minorites, while the IAM remained, at least implicitly resistant of females and persistently Jim Crow . . . ]

     [p. 141] . . . Eventually, with the exception of Northrop, every aviation company in Southern California recognized either the IAM or the UAW as a collective bargaining agent. With the exception of a few localized disputes, there was no further strikes or walkouts in Southern California aviation during the course of the war.

If Donald Douglas hated unions before this event, he certainly hated them after; and Local 683 returned the sentiment, excoriating Douglas as Donald Duck, the quacking union-basher. Throughout 1942, Douglas warded off the organization of his plants by matching union gains in other companies. By the end of 1943, however, his El Segundo plant had gone over to the other side, and in February 1944 Local 683 of the UAW won collective bargaining elections at Long Beach, leaving only the Douglas plant at Santa Monica unorganized. And finally, in October 1944, a majority of workers in the Santa Monica plant elected the IAM as their collective bargaining agent . . .

     [p. 141] ". . . The productivity statistics of aviation in Southern California remain today an impressive chapter in the history of American industry . . . First of all, there is the . . . tooling up of an entire industry from 1939 onward and the training, almost overnight, of a vast skilled and semi-skilled work force. Up to 90 percent of all jobs connected with airplane manufacturing were at least at the semi-skilled level . . . Yet no one had ever done such work before . . . on such a scale . . . Aviation skimmed the cream from other industries. One cannot overestimate the industrial accomplishment of bringing together so many intelligent, skilled, highly motivated men and [p. 142] women and transforming them into the single most accomplished corps of industrial workers outside the specialized crafts.

     [p.142] " . . .

     "There wer few, if any, precedents for this productivity and cost-effectiveness, other than those techniques borrowed from the automotive industry. Everything, each tool, each technique, had to be invented on the assembly line . . . [In 1942, more than 4000 suggestions from the assembly line were implemented by management. Later there were many suggestions from the field which were implemented.] Much of what was being built in the aviation plants, together with the techniques employed in manufacturing, was secret, even top secret. Workers could not discuss what they were doing . . .

     [p. 142] "Because it was a new industry, and because workers were involved and management was listening, the aircraft industry pioneered ergonomics, the science and art of fitting tools and machinery to human capacity and limits. Workers were constantly making suggestions as to how tools and production techniques could be made more efficient and less fatiguing. As women became more central to the work force, a number of ergonomic adjustments were made on their behalf, such as the lazy arm for moving machinery . . .

     "By its very nature, aircraft manufacture necessitated a near-heroic level of synchronized cooperation. Each airplane involved a minimum of 587,000 bits and pieces. From diverse points of origin, these 587,000 parts had to be made, transported, assembled, then further assembled into the component parts of an individual aircraft. Thirty-eight percent of the work was subcontracted. Hundreds of feeder plants prepared prepared airplane parts and systems for assembly at the major sites. Sometimes these feeder plants were subcontractors; sometimes they were owned by the company. Douglas, for example, had sub-assembly sites in Anaheim, El Monte, Fullerton, Elsinore, Santa Ana, and Long Beach, each of these places now [p. 143] transformed into an industrial suburb. All this intricacy of manufacture-thousands of parts flowing together into a river of aluminium and other metals that came to rest, at last, in one plant, then one airplane-had to be tracked and monitored without benefit of computers, through the simple technique of establishing index cards for each bit and part, then each component, then each aircraft. Each shipment generated its own cards, to be shuffled and reshuffled with other index cards so as to track and control the flow of aluminium parts into, eventurally a single aircraft.

     [p. 143] "Not only did each airplane involve thousands of parts, hence thousands of index cards, planes were manufactured in a consortium. Four companies . . . Freed from restrictions of anti-trust, functioning across company lines as as a vertically and horizontally integrated cooperative, the aircraft industry was functioning, paradoxically, in an industrial structure similar in some ways to that of Germany and Japan.

     [p. 149] ' . . . In 1942, Kaiser had yet another idea: the construction of giant Flying Boats. Liberty ships of the air, which could ferry cargo and troops above the submarine infested Atlantic. . . .

     ". . . Fearful of of being upstaged, and having to share the aviation industrry with Kaiser, the aviation industry reacted. Robert Gross, president of Lockheed and Donald Douglas were especially effective in lobbying Washington against Kaiser's bid to build five thousand Flying [p. 150] Boats. At the end of the wrangling, Kaiser had funds only to build one experimental prototype in partnership with Hughes Aircraft of Culver City.

     [p. 151] "The aircraft industry housed its people in Los Angeles and its suburbs. Many of them in fact were middle-class residents of the region, already housed. . . .

     [p. 152] "In Los Angeles, by contrast, private developers, sensing the long-term middle-class ambitions and financial capabilities of many aircraft workers, developed whole neighborhoods of one-story, two-bedroom bungalows for sale to them. . . .

     [p. 152] "Of the three major civilian-administered shipbuilding facilities in California-the California Shipbuilding Corporation shipyards on Terminal Island in Los Angeles Harbor, the Kaiser shipyards in Richmond, and Marinship in Marin County-only Marinship displayed a middle-class texture analogous to that of the aircraft factories . . .Marinship . . . was small, located in Sausalito in affluent Marin County. . . Established in March 1942 by former members of the Six Companies who had built Boulder/Hoover Dam, Marinship was directed by a who's who of California corporate and industrial blue bloods-including Kenneth and Stephen Bechtel, Felix Kahn and John McCone, a Bechtel employee [p. 153] who would soon be serving as high commissioner in Germany and later founding director of the CIA. Marinship built . . . [among others] the EC-2 Liberty freighters, which were named in honor of prominent figures from California history, including Jack London and Sun Yat-sen, the sometime San Franciscan who served as first president of the Republic of China.

 [p. 208] . . .

     " . . . bohemian writer and all-round rebel Henry Miller might very well [have disagreed with the promise of prosperity in 1940 California]. Life in Panorama City was just another example of the Air-Condidtioned Nightmare. Miller first used the phrase "air-conditioned nightmare" as the title of a book he completeted late in the war while living in Big Sur on the central coast. Based on a year-long auto tour of the United States from October 1940 to October 1941 and published by New Directions in late 1945, The Air-Conditioned Nightmare can be taken as a prophetic, anti-statement to everything that Panorama City stood for: conformity, routine, philistinism, sexual repression; the long, grey death, in short, to Henry Miller's way of thinking, of middle-class life in America.

     "Born in Brooklyn in 1891, Henry Valentine Miller-Val to his friends and the intimates who were legion-had spent only a few months in Southern California in 1910, doing odd jobs in Los Angeles and San Diego, before returning to New York. Like Walt Whitman, whom he resembled in so many respects, Henry Miller, both the man and the writer, was hard to classify. Was he the last representative of the 1920s generation, so infatuated with Paris, as Edumund Wilson claimed? Was he a social critic of prophetic importance, warning against the increasing conformity and mechanization of American life? Or was he a cad, a heel, a shameless sponger, whore-mongering pornographer, a poseur and blowhard, the perpetrator of some two million words of stream-of-consciousness prose that seemed to be saying everything, hence nothing, simultaneously?

     "The answer was yes to each query. In some vast and nearly impentrable way, Henry Miller was managing by the mid-1930s, when his autobiography Tropic of Cancer (1934) was published in Paris and banned in the United States, to have contained within himself all the contradictions and paradoxes that two of Miller's favorite writers, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Walt Whitman, considered a salient characteristic of the free-thinking, free-spirited American man of letters as social and cultural critic. Whatever Henry Miller might have become by 1940, when he [p. 209] returned to the United States after a tour of Greece resulting in The Colossus of Maroussi (1941) which some believe his best book-hierophant or shameless lech, free spirit or sponging bum, ingrate or reformed visionary in the Americanist tradition-Henry Miller was well on the way, as man, writer, and legend, to becoming one of the most influential writers ever to be based in California, for what Miller wrote, together with what he acted out and stood for, would in time pervade the value system of an entire generation and shift the sensibility of the entire nation.

     "All of this was a big order for [Henry Miller]a down-and-out writer nearing fifty in 1940, with only one important book available to the general public: a writer turned down by the Guggenheim Foundation when he applied for funds to tour the United States just as he had recently toured Greece, and wirite a book about his travels and observations. Thanks to an advance from Doubleday Doran, Miller made his trip anyway, after learning to drive in five lessons from aspiring poet Kenneth Patchen and buying for $100 a 1932 Buick sedan, which terrified him as he headed south toward New Hope, Pennsylvania, and from there into America itself.

     [Note that Kenneth Patchen's The Journal of Albion Moonlight, Padell Press, 1941, was in its fifth printing when Miller's The Air-Conditioned Nightmare was published. KR]

     "In the course of this year-long journey of return and anti-homecoming, Miller drove, worked, crashed, and sponged his way across America: an over-age-in-grade Parisian expatriate returning to America along with a whole generation of emigres, the vast majority of them more solvent and respectable than Miller, which was not a difficult accomplishment. A decade later, another rebel, Jack Kerouac, would make a similar journey in part under Miller's inspiration; for the important thing about Miller's journey was that it brought him, once again to California, where he hung out with like-minded people-John Steinbeck's friend Ed (Doc) Ricketts in Monterey and Lawrence Clark Powell, a literary critic and former French expatriate, then settling into a career as librarian and writer at UCLA.

     "Like so many expatriates, Henry Miller liked California-inasmuch as he could find anything to like about the the United States-and decided to settle there. Thanks to the generosity of two friends, Margaret and Gilbert Neiman, he could now do exactly that: settle into the Neiman's home in the Beverly Glen district of Los Angeles as a more or less permanent non-paying guest. Two years later, in May 1944, Miller accepted a further offer of hospitality, moving in with artist Lynda Sargent . . . in Sargent's Log House on the Big Sur coast, later famous as the site of the Nepenthe Restaurant . . . [p. 210] [The text goes on to say that Sargent sold the building to Orson Welles in May 1944, forcing Miller to move to Partington Ridge, further into the Big Sur mountains . . . ]

     " . . . From one perspective The Air-Condiditoned Nightmare [which he had begun before Pearl Harbor] can be seen as a bitter, dismissive, contempt-ridden indictment of American life as ordinary men and women lived it-or were being asked to die for it in wartime . . . He encountered the great American ugliness, the great American chill. "I didn't like the look of the American house . . . there is something cold, austere, something barren and chill, about the architecture of the American home. It was home, with all the ugly, evil, sinister connotations which the word contains for a restless soul. There was a frigid moral aspect to it which chilled me to the bone.""

     "" . . . Topographically, the country is magnificent-and terrifying . . . Nowhere else in the world is the divorce between man and nature so complete. Nowhere [he had encountered] such a dull, monotonous fabric of life as here in America. Here boredom reaches its peak. . . . To call this a society of free people is blasphemous . . . What we have to offer the world besides the superabundant loot which we recklessly plunder from the earth under the delusion that this insane activity represents progress and enlightenment."

     " . . . [p. 211] Miller's work, "the dirty books of a generation, a call, however muddled, to transcendence and liberation through eros . . .

     "Others, however, considered Miller's books purient-and worse, radical-trash, speaking with an especially corrupting power to the young. Already, well before the war had ended-indeed, because of the war-America was finding itself uneasy about its youth: not so much of the young men and women in uniform, but the half-generation just behind them, the pachucos and V-girls, the growing number of young offenders from the inner city. Writing in Look magazine in January 1946, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover predicted an outburst of juvenile delinquency in the post-war era. Already, Hoover pointed out, seventeen-year olds had the highest arrest rate of any age group in the country. Then there was the recently released veteran, only a few years older, to be watched, the sort who had made up the bulk of the motorcycle gang that had taken over Hollister in July 1947 . . . only jeans and a T-shirt and a mumbled way of talking could manage to express a massive rebellion and thus . . . hold a troubled identity together.

     "Rebellion then was in the air and would grow steadily thoughout the next decade, and Henry Miller . . . was in some palpable way emerging as the guru and avatar of an emerging alternative vision . . . From Miller, . . . a generation of alienated young people, especially pacifists, but veterans as well, were imbibing "an engaging potpourri of mysticism, egoism, sexualism, surrealism, and anarchism."

     "Accentuated and enhanced by Miller's own eclectic and chaotic religiosity, which emphasized astrology and the occult, a certain free-wheeling mysticism dovetailed easily withthe already flourishing tradition of religious cults in California . . .

     [p. 212] " . . .

     " . . . There was in Miller's world view a hallucinogenic quality transcending drug-induced visions, although lesser beings would need drugs to get there; a view of the world, that is, as nightmarish and deceptive-and only true and beautiful on the other side, however one got there.'

     " . . . as early as 1946, one observer at least was seeing in the gathering Berkeley-Big Sur bohemia the makings of an alternative view of American life that could in time become the makings of a mass movement. Over the next decade and a half, the attitudes described by Brady would emerge as the beat movement and this sensibility, in turn quickened by generational revolt and a hated war in Vietnam would become the hippie movement, the anti-establishment movement, the anti-everything movement: that congeries of resentments and shifting values and attitudes, in short, that would coalesce in the 1960s as a whole new way of looking at American life . . .

     " . . .

     [p. 230] ". . . Los Angeles and its hinterlands grew even more eccentric and colorful as the area approached its new status, reached in 1949, of being the third largest metropolitan region in the United States. T?hirty-two percent of the population of greater Los Angeles had arrived since 1940. The largest number of immigrants had come from either the west south-central census area (Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas) or the west north-central census area (Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska, Kansas, the Dakotas). Los Angeles, in other words, remained the whitest big city in America. On the other hand, it had more Mexicans than any other city outside of Mexico itself and nearly fifty distinguishable tribes or nation-groups of Native Americans: all this augmented by the returning Japanese-Americans and a growing [p. 231] black population, forecasting the diversity in place by the 1970s. Aside from the City of Angels proper-the fourth largest city in the United States since 1945, 1.9 million people spread over 451 square miles, divided by the City Planning Commission into fifty-nine distinct communities with a total of 932 recognizable neighborhoods-the greater Los Angeles region encompassed forty-five cities and nearly ninety unincorporated areas. One critic compated it to an aggregation of movie sets.

     "After the war, American observers began to respond to what English residents such as Aldous Huxley had long since noticed, the delightful singularity of the region. . . . Saturday Evening Post, "Los Angeles is New York in purple shorts with its brains knocked out." Los Angeles Daily News columnist Matt Weinstock: Los Angeles was the most insulted city in the world-and frequently deserved it." "Los Angeles has been described as a glorious climate wasted on an undeserving, vulgar, boorish people." Sam Boal, New York Times Magazine, "Los Angeles is hopelessly overcrowded. It is short of houses, short of restaurants, short of stores, even short of filling stations. Its traffic problems, because it lives on wheels, is complex almost beyond description."

     "In great part because of the lure of Hollywood, Los Angeles in the mid-to late 1940s was noticeably peopled by attractive young women. It was also an important American divorce capital, granting twice as many divorces as Reno, three times as many as Miami . . . The judges in wartime and post-war Los Angeles County were espeically liberal and hasty granting divorces . . . Photographers made a specialty of photographing newly minted divorcées . . .

     [p. 234] ". . .

     "Los Angeles so often seemed a city of people on the edge, people pushing it to the breaking point, either from an excess of resources and opportunities or from desperate scarcity. . . .

     " . . .

     "Post-war Los Angeles, one writer claimed, was one big cocktail lounge, with every stool occupied by a female available for pickup. An infinite arrary of restaurants, nightclubs, and watering holes, ranging up and down the social scale, from dives to such reservation-only establishments as Ciro's, Chasen's. the Brown Derby, Perino's, and Romanoff's extended from the Chateau Gardens in San Fernando to Shanghai Red's at the San Pedro Harbor . . .

     [p. 235] " . . . Higher on the evolutionary scale were such hangouts as Charlie Foy's Supper Club in the San Fernando Valley; the Tail o' the Cock on La Cienega and Musso and Frank on Hollywood Boulevard; Lucey's on Melrose Avenue; Jack's at the Beach on [in] Ocean Park where Bugsey Siegel enjoyed his last meal; the Pacific Dining Car in the Downtown; the original Taix on East Commercial Street, where antiquarian bookseller Jacob Israel Zeitlin ran a literary round table; and the Good Fellows Grotto . . .

      "Historians of Americn night life might justifiably pass over Los Angeles 1947 as a significant restaurant city, its major claim to fame in this regard having been the invention of the cafeteria in 1905, an eating place perfected by the Boos brothers John and Horace, and Clifford Cliinton in the 1920s and 1930s. Yet being a singles city, Los Angeles was a place where people frequently ate out, and hundreds of establishments, great and small, rose up to meet this market. Lawry's on La Cienega helped Los Angeles celebrate the post-war return of beef with heroic servings of prime rib. Mama Weiss's served goulash . . . Paul's Duck Press catered to hunters, prepared game in the style of the Tour d'Argent. Perino's one of the most expensive, mixed show biz and upper-crust WASP . . .

     [p. 236]  " . . . 1947 the last year of studio feudalism . . .

     [p. 237] " . . .

     [p. 238] "Perhaps, only someone as bleak, as desperate. as displaced as Raymond Chandler-bleak in his career prospects, bleak in his emotional life and thwarted sexuality, bleak in his constant drinking-could capture the essential bleakness of life in what so often seemed the bleakest city in America. Only James M. Cain and Nathanael West equal Chandler . . . Raymond Chandler was essentially a 1940s writer. His Black Mask stories of the 1930s are significant, but many of them were recycled into later novels. More important, Chandler's point of view, his style, his tone, his obseessions were 1940s: 1940s Los Angeles, more precisely, the city of Bugsey Siegel and George Raft; the city of Detective Lieutenant Harry Fremont, capable of shooting a suspect down in cold blood, and all the other LAPD cops not reluctant to administer to Philip Marlowe, or anyone else for that matter, a beating; the city of five daily newpapers and sixteen hours of headlines; the city of the Black Dahlia and the dives on Beacon Street and furtive homosexual acction in Pershing Square and the sex jungle on the palisades above Santa Monica Beach.

     " . . .

     "Chandler despised Los Angeles . . . [p. 239]

     [p. 239] "Not accidentally, Chandler's brief career as a writer coincided with Hollywood's film noir years, in which Chandler himself played an important part as screenwriter and story source. Six of Chandler's novels were made into movies in his lifetime, and Chandler himself was nominated for Academy Awards for his work on Double Indemnity and The Blue Dahlia. Inspired in part by German Expressionism, with a preference for bleak people in claustrophobic settings, film noir was suited perfectly to 1940s Los Angeles as Chandler, the cops, the crime reporters, and the gangsters themselves were encountering it: a restricted and restrictive city, angular, grim, asking no quarter and giving even less. . ..

     " . . .

     [p. 242] ". . . The rise of Earl Warren coincided with the rise of California, and the governor was shaped almost exclusively by the state's culture and institutions. Earl Warren was at once the last of the High Provincials, in Josiah Royce's phrase, with roots in the frontier, and among the youngest of the New Men, the Progressive generation led by Hiram Johnson and Herbert Hoover, the public men in the vanguard of California's rise to national prominence. A native Californian, Earl Warren was born in Los Angeles on 18 March 1891, when that city had slightly more than fifty thousand citizens. He was reared in Bakersfield in southern Kern County when that community was still a raw and sometimes violent frontier town. Only four previous governors-Romualdo Pacheco, George Pardee, Hiram Johnson and James Rolph Jr.-had been native sons; and only one governor, Hiram Johnson, had ever been elected to a second term. Earl Warren was elected three times, in 1942, 1946, and 1950. He served as governor of California for ten years and eight months, the longest gubernatorial term in California history. He then assumed an office, Chief Justice of the United States of America, second only to the presidency in importance, and in that office earned a secure place in the history of his country.

     " . . .

     [p. 271] ". . . Artie Samish became the political boss of California by orchestrating the flow of campaign contributions to candidates favoring his clients or conversely, by financing opponents of can-[p. 272]didates who were showing signs of being unwilling to take guidance from [Samish]."

     [p. 265] In 1946 Artie Samish ran Howser, the district attorney of Los Angeles, against the Democrat's San Francisco district attorney, Edmund (Pat) Brown for Kenney's vacant Attorney General seat. Brown was defeated and Howser proved corrupt. Warren created a statewide Commission on Organized Crime under [p. 266] the chairmanship of retired Admiral William Standley, formerly chief of naval operations and ambassador to the USSR. To administer the Commission, Warren appointed his longtime associate Warren Olney III. By 1950 Warren had completely undermined Howser, who failed to win the Republican nomination for reelection. In the general election of 1950, Republican candidate Edward Shattuck was defeated by Pat Brown . . . with the tacit approval of Warren . . . The bond between the two men . . . constitutes the central political continuity in California between 1950 and 1966 when Pat Brown was defeated for governor by Ronald Reagan. Earl Warren, Republican, recruited Pat Brown, Democrat, into the Party of California, committed to an essentially bipartisan, growth-oriented, neo-Progressive program based in public works. . . .

     [p. 266] "Warren refused to endorse candidates . . .

     " . . . Warren weas unbeholden to the corporate sector that exercised such a continuing influence in Republican circles . . . [p. 267]

     [p. 267] " . . .

      [p. 269] Warren " . . . was the governor of a dynamic state, second only to New York in population, and he had a solid record of administration and reform, in the prison system especially. As attorney general, Warren had inherited a [lackadaisical] correctional culture . . .

     "Although the term had not yet been invented, Earl Warren was an avid environmentalist in the style of outdoorsmen who love to hike, camp, hunt and fish. . . . To revitalize the Division of Forestry, Warren turned to Professor Emanuel Fritz of the Department of Forestry at UC Berkeley, who as chairman of the state commission oversaw the expansion and improvement of the Division and established a program of timber replacement. To improve the conservation and management of wildlife resources in California, Warren turned to General of the Army Henry H. (Hap) Arnold, the retired chief of staff of the Army Air Forces, then living in Sonoma. As chairman of the Fish and Wildlife Commission, General Arnold put California in the forefront of the wildlife conservation movement, while at the same time maintaining a responsible fishjing and hunting program under strict licensing.

     "To supervise the reform of California's overburdened and lethal road and highway system, Warren turned to Charles Purcell-the person most responsible for the successful construction of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Serving as state engineer . . . Purcell represented the essence of the Progressive activities, public works . . . Warren promoted him, putting him in charge of an ambitious new highway program. During the war . . . [p. 270] devoted his best his best energies to keeping the road and highway system of California functional for defense shipments and troop movements. After the war, Purcell drew up plans for an entirely new system that was long overdue. . . . a billion-dollar master plan of freeways, highways and county roads . . . Warren fought to have a gas tax enacted to finance this ambitious program. It took him until 1953 for him to overcome the opposition of Big Oil . . .

     [p. 270] " . . . Warren promoted an aggressive program of publically sponsored health care . . . he reorganized and improved the state's Department of Public Health . . . Warren established a Department of Mental Hygiene, which pioneered the employment of preventive and treatment-oriented mental health programs . . . Warren was outspoken in favor of a statewide program of state-sponsored health insurance. As early ass 1944, discussion of a pre-paid comprehensive health insurance plan for California . . . surfaced as a recommendation of the Reconstruction and Reemployment Commission. The ultra-conservative California Medical Association, through the campaign firm, suggested that Warren's program were "socialized medicine." The Association and other ultra-conservatives began to whisper that Warren was secretly a Communist, or at least a Communist sympathizer."

     [p. 270] "The long resistance of Big Oil to the highway tax and the ability of the California Medical Association . . . to sink Warren's health insurance program underscored the difficulty of governingt California . . . the absence of parties and party discipline . . . the susceptibility of the electorate to manipulations by mass media . . . .

     [p. 272] . . .

     "Was Artie Samish corrupt? . . . Investigated in the late 1930s by H.R. Philbrick, a private detective in the employ of the grand jury, Samish had helped the speaker of the Assembbly be put on the payroll of the Santa Anita race track. The speaker, William Moseley Jones, had in turn appointed assemblymen to the Committee on Motor Vehicles and the Committee on Public Morals . . .

     [p. 273] "Telling it all, letting the world know California's nasty secret-that the reforms of the Progressive era had been subverted, that California had become controlled by corporate and other interests," Samish gave his story to Collier's, The Secret Boss of California 13 and 20 August, 1949, written by Velie.

     " . . .

 [p. 285] " . . .

     "Nixon's [1946] anti-Communist crusade was only in part about Communism. In Southern California at least, the very heart of Nixon country, anti-Communism also framed the debate regarding development. For all its boom mentality, pre-World War II Southern California had paradoxically sustained within itself a quirky tendency to the left, even among developers. H. Gaylord Wilshire and John Randolph Haynes, for example, two of the most successful developers of the pre- and post-First World War era, were committed Socialists. Pasadena sustained a flourishing Fabian socialist circle among its millionaires. The post-Second World War boom, by contrast, was controlled by shadowy corporations and banks and equally shadowy developers who pushed the anti-Communism issue and supported anti-Communist politicians such as Richard Nixon. By so doing, the pro-development forces sought to create by implication and psychological association a strong counter-argumenht and counter-force in favor of laissez-faire growth. The anti-Communist crusade, in short, helped soften up innumerable city councils, planning commissions, and zoning boards, threatening them with the implied argu- [p. 286] ment: regulation of growth replicates the planned economies and political controls of Communism.

Eugene Burdick, The Ninth Wave, 1956

     [p. 286] . . . In 1940-41, the House Committee on Un-American Activities, then chaired by Representative Matin Dies of Texas, had engaged in a preliminary skirmish against the Hollywood Reds but backed off when the Soviet Union and the United States became wartime allies. The Dies Committee had been curious about what it called "premature anti-fascism" in Hollywood, which is to say, anti-fascist activity the committee suspected was Communist-inspired, such as the formation of the Hollywood Anti-Nazi League in 1936 which sponsored the visit of French novelist turned Loyalist aviator Andre Malraux. Arriving in Los Angeles on behalf of the Spanish Republic in 1937 . . .

     After the war . . . [p. 287] Internally and externally, Hollywood was in trouble on the Communist issue, and on other matters. Among other things, there was television. . . .

     [p. 287] "What turned out to be a decade of woe for Hollywood opened in 1945 with two years of ferocious strikes in which Communist and anti-Communist elements in the various unions struggled for power.

       ". . .

     [p. 288] "Executive Hollywood was on the defensive, then, when the House Committee on Un-American Activities sent out its subpoenas in the fall of 1947. First of all, there were the strikes themselves, which had brought the studios dangerously close to being dominated by the Communsit-controlled Conference of Studio Unions, which did not look good to Washington. Then there was the embarrassing matter of the pro-Soviet films produced during the war. The war, in fact, offered pro-Soviet screenwriters the opportunity of a lifetime. Prior to the war, Hollywood demanded a distanced, at best satiric, approach to Soviet society as in the case of Ninotchka (1939), starring Greta Garbo as a Soviet commissar who falls in love with the Western way of life. By 1943 John Howard Lawson, the archdeacon of Hollywood Communists, could put a scene in the film Action in the North Sea (1943) . . .

     "By 1947 Hollywood moguls such as Jack Warner had grown fearful at what they had done. They had celebratede Stalin as a great world statesman, musing over maps and spinning globes with Davies and Churchill. They had recognized aircraft as our own, and depicted a utopian Russia-nightclubs, dancing peasants, Tchaikovsky music everywhere-more idealized than any Soviet propaganda would dare attempt . . .

 [p. 290] "The first major sign that Hollywood was in trouble . . . with the American public on the Communist issue was the overnight reversal of the popularity of Charles Chaplin. Arriving in the United States on the SS Cairnrona in September 1910 along with British comedian Stan Laurel . . . [p. 291]

     [p. 291] "By 1917 Chaplin was making a million dollars a year under contract to First National and had achieved his wish. Yet for all his popularity, the Little Tramp missed something essential-whatever that was-in his connection to the American people. . .

     " . . . In 1944 Chaplin was indicted on felony charges under the Mann Act . . . from which he was acquitted. The next year another paternity suit was filed by the same woman, Chaplin was ordered to pay child support despite the failure of a blood test to establish paternity . . . Chaplin concluded the year 1946 by marrying Oona O'Neill, the daughter of playwright Eugene O'Neill . . .

   [p. 292] . . . At this point, Chaplin began to become an active member of the Salka Viertel's émigre circle, as if to reconfirm to himself his residency in a hostile country . . .

     "It took one last element, the hostility of Roman Catholics when Chaplin released Monsieur Verdoux in 1947 . . . Clare Booth Luce and the Legion of Decency campaigned against Chaplin . . .

     ". . . On 18 September 1952 Charles and Oona Chaplin sailed for London on the Queen Elizabeth. On board he received a warning that if he returned he would be questioned about his political affiliations and turpitudity.

     " . . .

     [p. 293] Starr tries to explicate the complex relations aroused in and by the movie business as it tries to unleash, channel and profit from celluoid dreams. Certainly the Communists had applied Marxist analysis to the generation of cinematic consciousness; Benjamin certainly understood the sorts of ideologoical forces generated by this system. And the movie business becomes its own problem to the oligarchy, until it eventually becomes the oligarchy . . . ]

     Starr appends several alternatives or caveats: 1)the ostracism of Charlie Chaplin constituted a ritual act in which the slave-master relationship between Hollywood and its audience reversed itself because Chaplin had exceeded even the elastic boundaries of Hollywood sexuality without the permission of the American people; 2) Chaplin's contempt for the public, which was the contempt of Chaplin's employers in Hollywood as well-had become too overt and had linked itself to the far left, as it had in the case of so many screenwriters; 3) During the Second World War, Hollywood had overplayed its hand in telling the American people that Hollywood was winning the war, almost singlehandedly, while, in fact, while others fought and died, Hollywood had increased its status as a priviledged enclave.

     In October 1947, American nobodies, most of them film fans, including freshman congressman Richard Nixon, took cyclical revenge on their Hollywood royalty . . . The HUAC hearing repeated the Red Scare that followed the First World War. They were also a replay of the mid-1920s When the American people had clamped down on Desmond Taylor and Fatty Arbuckle. . . .

     [p. 293] "The first group to testify before the committee, the anit-Communists associated with the Motion Picture Alliance . . . understood that a populist reaction was brewing . . . around communism. The MPAPA had been forged out of an earlier confrontation, a National Labor Relations Board election in 1940, in which the older and very left-wing Screenwriters Guild prevailed. MAPA members included: Adolphe Menjou, screenwriters Ayn Rand and Rupert Hughes, Mrs Lela Rogers, actors, Robert Taylor; Robert Montgomery, George Murphy, Ronald Reagan and Gary Cooper; director, Leo McCarey and producers Walt Disney and Louis B. Mayer.

     [p. 293] " . . .

     " . . . Jack Warner, head of the most liberal of the studios before the war, met in secret with "the HUAC staffers a few months before the open hearings and named people in Hollywood he thought were Communists, a list that was read back to him in openen session in October. Few of these people would ever work in th the industry over the next fifteen years. At the conclusion of Warner's testimony-the most shameless, self-seeking, sycophantic, and evasive testimony in the history of the committee- Chariman J. Parnell Thomas warmly shook Warner's hand. Warner had gotten himself off the hook . . . for various wartime indiscretions.

     [p. 294] Starr insists that the Hollywood Ten (Sometines, nineteen) were all more or less Communists and that that is relevant to their harassassment. John Howard Lawson . . . was a witchhunter's dream: a Jewish radical masquarading behind a WASP name, a brash doctrinaire activist incapable of discretion . . . Screenwriter Dalton Trumbo, another one of the Ten, claimed that he joined the Communist party in 1943; . . . Trumbo's novel Johnny Got His Gun, published on 3 September 1939 and serialized in the Daily Worker, offered the most powerful statement possible, the depiction of the American veteran as a living corpse, for keeping the United States out of war, or for that matter, for dissuading Hitler from invading Russia.

     Writing in the Saturday Review of Literature for 16 July 1949, historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr. attacked the Hollywod Ten as overpaid hacks who had gone Communist out of a mixture of guilt and arrogance and in the process had given mainstream liberalism a bad name . . . Alvah Bessie, while personally courageous (he fought with the Abraham Lincoln Brigade in Spain), had few screenplays to his credit; Ring Lardner Jr. didn't compare with his father; Edward Dymtryk, a director with some talent.

     [p. 295] "Dalton Trumbo . . . had real talent. Like the rest of the Ten, however, Trumbo was addicted to Hollywood for the money, the money, the money. He needed lots of it and nothing else in the United States-with the exception of robbing banks-yielded cash like scriptwriting. Trumbo had other addictions as well, the inevitable by-products of the fast-paced lon-the-edge life he led, which included Seconal, Benzedrine, and dexedrine . . .

     ". . .

     [p. 301] "If one were to send to Central Casting for someone to embody the Folks of Southern California in all their hope, glory, and occasional grotesquerie, then John B. Tenny [1898- ] might very well turn up on the set. But then again, Tenny himself-hard-drinking, paranoid, dyspeptic-could have been played by W.C. Fields in one of the actor's grouchier moods. Born in St. Louis, Tenney arrived in Los Angeles as a boy of ten in 1908 with his parents as they joined the great migration of Folks to the Southland. During the war, he fought with the American Expeditionary Force in France. Upon his return, Tenney, a pianist, formed the Majestic Orchestra and spent the first half of the 1920s driving from dance hall to dance hall throughout the southern tier of the state. When bookings in the better dance halls or hotels wre lacking, the Majestic played places like the Owl in Mexicali. Situated across the border from Calexico, Mexicali functioned as a funnel for Mexican farm workers passing to and from the Imperial Valley. In January 1923 Tenney and the Majestic Orchestra were playing the Imperial Dance Hall in Mexicali. For some weeks previously, Tenney had been fiddling with a tune in his mind, a modified waltz. A regular at the Imperial was a woman named Rose, who ran a boardinghouse for railroad men in Brawley, which is to put the best possible interpretation upon the establishment. Rose would come into the Imperial after midnight, already a bit drunk, and was wont to break into tears, especially when Tenney and the Majestic played the waltz tune Tenney had composed. Seeing Rose in tears one night, Tenney was inspired to attach lyrics to his melody. He later described Mexicali Rose as a tribute to all beautiful, black-eyed señoritas. Like the Ramona myth, Mexicali Rose, took on a life of its own. Two movies were made, and the sheet music sold steadily throughout Tenney's lifetime. Mexicali Rose became one of the most recorded songs in the history of Tin Pan Alley. Banal, sentimental, touched with spurious Hispanic romance, the song embodied the hopes and dreams of the Folks as they settled into their new identity as Southern Californians.

 [p. 301] ". . . the third-tier orchestra leader knew he had to find a better way to make a living . . . Graduating from night law school and passing the bar, Tenney entered local poliitics, and in 1936 he won election to the assembly from Los Angeles County as a populist Folk-oriented Democrat, more than a little to the left. Tenney entered elective politics via the usual route in [p. 302] California: political boss Artie Samish. According to Samish, Tenney called on him in Sacramento and told the rotund boss of his interest in getting elected. "What's your backgroung, what have you done?" asked Artie. Replied Tenney "I've written the song Mexicali Rose." To which Samish responded: "That's good enough for me,"and John Tenney, erstwhile pianist and bandleader with the Majestic Orchestra, went to the assembly along with his pal Samuel Yorty, another son of the Folks, Nebraska-born, and like Tenney, a night law school graduate.

     [p. 302] The Los Angeles County Tenney and Yorty represented had strongly supported Upton Sinclair in his campaign for governor in 1934. The Folks were mostly Democrats and mad as hell against the prevailing plutocracy of Southern California. Successively, the Yorty-Tenney constituency supported such radical measures as Upton Sinclair's End Poverty in California (EPIC) campaign of 1934, the pension plan advocated by Dr. Francis E. Townsend of Long Beach under the rubric Old Age Revolving Pensions, Ltd., the Ham and Eggs pension plan that wnet before the voters in 1938, the crypto-millenarian United States Senate campaign of Sheridan Downey that same year, whichy was successful and the equally successful gubernatorial campaign of Culbert Olson, which at long last brought the New Deal to California. The Folks of Los Angeles County, in short, wre decidedly to the left. The House Un-American Activities Committee chaired by Marin Dies, in fact, had affidavits in its possession to the effect that John Tenney and Samual Yorty had been members of the Communist Party between 1936 and 1937. . . Tenney was also listed with the Dies Committee as a supporter of a large number of left-wing causes, including the Friends of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade. No sooner had they reached the assembly than Tenney and Yorty joined together to sponsor a bill to repeal the Criminal Syndicalism Act of 1919, which had been used with such a telling effect against left-wing agricultural unions throughout the 1930s.

     In December [1938] Tenney was elected to the lucrative post of president of Local 47 of the American Federation of Musicians. No one was expected to live on an assemblyman's salary. Tenney loved the job. [The dates are confusing through this anecdote.] Then in 1939, Tenney lost the union presidency-his job, his income, his prestige, his identity-in a closely constested election. Tenney blamed the Communists for organizing his ouster. He returned to Sac- [p. 301] ramento a bitter man . . .

     [p. 303] Already, Tenney's friend and colleague Sam Yorty was turning right. In December 1939 Yorty had become chairman of the Assembly Relief Investigating Committee, which in 1940 turned into a witch-hunt for Communist social workers in the State Relief Administration. By the fall of 1940, Jack Tenney had followed Yorty to the right. In September Tenney led a drive in the legislature to ban the Communist Party from the ballot. The bill passed and was signed by Governor Olson, but the California Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in 1942, the year Tenney, now a Republican, won election to the state senate. Tenney achieved the chairmanship of the Joint Fact-Finding Committee on Un-American Activities in California, formed in 1941. . . . Tenney emerged as the Grand Inquisitor . . . Senator Tenney had become . . . an inquisitor from the Folks, smart enough to be dangerous, publicly placed to do mischief, and out to avenge the loss of the Musician's Union . . .

     "During the war years, Tenney was cautious. After the war, by contrast, in hearings held between 1945 and 1948, the Tenney Committee aggressively concerned itself with allegations of Communism in unions, at the University of California, in local elections, in high school curricula and among teachers . . . Tenney's chilef counsel R.E. Combs . . .

     [p. 304] " . . . people who might otherwise not given Jack Tenney the time of day, now were forced to listen as his committee humiliated them.

     "The transcripts . . . seethe with barely suppressed rituals of social revenge . . . The central investigative resource of the Tenney Committee was an elaborate system of index cards compiled by Combs, who subscribed to hundreds of journals and neewpapers, including Communist Party publications. Painstakingly, Combs woud enter onto cards the name of each organization and each indidvidual listed as a supporter. By 1943 he had nearly fourteen thousand cross-indexed cards."

     [p. 304] ' . . . The Communist Party of California . . . was more or less an open affair. In 1938 the Party had launched the first openly Communist newspaper, the People's Daily World, edited and published in San Francisco. Party functionaries such as Dorothy Healy, secretary of the Communist Party in Los Angeles County, were in the late 1930s and into the war years increasingly operating in the open and aligning themselves with scores of other organizations; . . . Healy resisted the cult of secrecy that characterized CP activities in Hollywood. A 1939 pamphlet, The Communist Party: Whom and How to Recruit in California, set forth an ambitious program to make the Party become perceived as a mainstream political organization. by working people up and down the state. . . .

     [p. 305] " . . . Saturday 25 October 1942, the Los Angeles County Communist Part joined representatives from Governor Culbert Olson's and Lieutenant Governor Ellis Patterson's office . . . in the Embassy Auditorium on South Grand St. as a united front among liberal and Communist candidates.

     " . . . By 1947 . . . the Communist Party of California launched a drive to build its membership to ten thousand by September. Pamphlets and instructional manuals supporting this drive stressed a pro-labor, pro-union, pro-third-party, and pro-Negro front.

     "In this last emphasis, the securing of civil rights and economic opportunity for African-Americans, CP literature from the period anticipated the civil rights drive of the 1960s . . . Tenney had wanted the entire Civil Rights Action Conference investigated as a Communist front, but Pearl Harbor intervened. . . .

     [p. 305] "Tenney was especially angry with lawyer-activist-historian Carey McWilliams, who had played a major role in civil rights agitation, including an important role in the 1941 civil rights conference in San Francisco. Cross-examining McWilliams in 1947, Tenney coaxed from him a refusal to condemn interracial marriage. The 1947 report of the Tenney Committee claimed McWilliams advocated black and white marriage, "part of the Communist phillosophy," the report [p. 305] claimed, "of breaking down the races." This attack represented the most ugly line of attack ever taken by the intemperate inquisitor form Los Angeles County.

     [p. 306] The 1948 third-party Progressive movement led by former Vice President Henry Wallace offered a renewal of the United Front of World War II for the Left in California as well as the rest of the nation . . .

     " . . .

     [p. 307] In 1949 Tenney place a poor fifth in the race for mayor of Los Angeles. He subsequently failed in two attempts to reach the House of Representatives. In 1952 he ran for Vice President of the United States on the Christian National Party ticket alongside General of the Army Douglas MacArthur. By 1959 Jack Tenney was back where he began, in the desert, practicing law in Banning, a Mexicali Rose sort of town.

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Les Storrs Santa Monica Portrait of a City Yesterday and Today, Santa Monica Bank: Santa Monica, CA, 1974, 67 pp., 1940s

     "As a result, the [Douglas Aircraft Co.] company was well prepared for the demands of World War II. At the peak of production in the war years, the company had a total of 160,000 employees in six plants, with close to 40,000 of them in the home plant in Santa Monica.

     "As a result of this huge industrial development, Santa Monica's basic character changed from that of a quiet seaside residential community to something very different. Where previously almost all residents had lived in single family homes, apartments began to appear in some numbers, a trend which was to be greatly accelerated in years to come.

     " . . .

     " . . . a group of Douglas scientists developed into the Rand Corp., and that from the latter sprang System Development Corp . . ."

" . . .

Chapter Five: World War II and its Impact

     " . . . December 7, 1941

     " . . . the stunned reaction of the people, the sense of outrage, the feeling of urgency which sometimes bordered upon hysteria.

     "Citizens of Japanese ancestry were rounded up and shipped on to internment camps at Tule Lake; anti-aircraft guns were set up in front of city hall and elsewhere; the great Douglas Aircraft Co. plant began a program of rapid expansion to fill military orders, the payroll eventually reaching nearly 70,000 persons; the plant and the adjoining municipal airport were effectively camouflaged; young men and some young women rushed to join the armed forces; blackouts were imposed lest there be an attack from the sea; volunteers were enlisted for all manner of duties in what was called "civilian defense."

     " . . .

     " . . . resulted in a burden upon local government and public facilities for which they were not organized to meet and in which they faced the additional problem of unavailability of supplies.

     "Ordinary citizens attempted to fill the gaps as best they could, usually by volunteering for civilian defense duties. Citizen volunteer were trained by [for] police and fire duties, as well as for the strictly wartime services such as block wardens, aircraft spotters, and radio communications personnel.

     " . . .

     "The influx of thousands of defense workers created an immediate housing shortage, one which was to persist for some years after the war ended. Santa Monica officialdom did wht it had to do; it in effect suspended all zoning regulations and urged that accommodations be created for the workers, whether zoing violations resulted or not.

     "Buildings intended to house one family . . . provided quarters for four. Camp trailers were parked in back yards, sometimes without adequate sanitary facilities, and used as housing.

     " . . .

     "The same thing was true of variances granted for wartime industries in areas not zoned for that purpose. Usuallly such variances purported to be "for the duration of the emergency," but even so, the end of the "emergency" was not declared for many years after the termination of the conflict.

     " . . . the owners of the properties came to feel that they had a vested interest in whatever operation had been permitted, whether it was a boarding house, apartment at the rear of the house, or out-of-zone industrial operations.

     "Such are the problems which arise in a genuine national emergency.

     'Less dramatic . . . than [the civil defense volunteers], the[se] moves to accomodate a sudden increase in demand for housing were far more significant in the long run.

     " . . . almost all supplies: gasoline, food, building materials, were rationed. Everything, including labor, was diverted to the war effort, and only the most basic of civilian needs were met.

     "There was . . . no answer to the housing problem except "doubling up" in that which was available,

     "New residents continued to come to Santa Monica,, public services deteriorated, both because of lack of money, materials and manpower and because of the inherent inefficiency of a form of government which had three administrative heads of equal authority, authority of which each tended to be . . . jealous.

     "Municipal tax rates climbed as dissatisfaction increased, and even before the war ended a Board of Freeholders had been chosen to draft a new charter.

     " . . .

     [Storrs uses the analogy of a corporation and its board of directors when he describes the Board of Freeholders rationale, KR]

     " . . . the Board believed that the council-manager form of local government provides the highest degree of efficiency and virtually eliminates political log-rolling."

 " . . . the new city council was organized when the council-manager charter became effective in 1947. Maurice M. King . . . acting city manager. . . . city engineer uner the old government . . . the council then selected Randall M. Dorton, city manager.

     ""Dal" Dorton . . . served as city manager in Long Beach and Monterey.

     An expert in municipal finance . . . reduced the tax rate and also city expenses, at a rate greater than the national inflationary spiral.

     " . . . assessed valuation increased steadily [but not too rapidly for taxpayers] . . .

     " . . . a heart attack brought his retirement.

     "George Bundy, member of an old and respected Santa Monica family, had served under Dorton as assistant city manager . . . succeeded him . . . and he, too suffered a serious heart attack."

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Betty Lou Young Our First Century: The Los Angeles Athletic Club 1880-1980, LAAC Press: Los Angeles, California 1979, 176pp., 1940s

     " . . .the conversion to a wartime economy brought unexpected financial relierf.

     "The Yacht Club was taken over by the Coast Guard, the Deauville by the Federal Government, and the Hermosa Biltmore by the National Youth Administration. The SMAC was sold to a private buyer , , ,

13. Pursuit of Excellence

     " . . .

     "The Deauville Club, meanwhile, was having more than its share of troubles. First it lost its shorefront to accretion; now it was in danger of being hemmed in by city parking lots built on the artificially created land. Conversations were held with the city attorney to stop the construction, but a change in the law opened the way for the city to proceed."

 

 

(Back to Sources)

 

 

Betty Lou Young and Randy Young Santa Monica Canyon: A Walk Through History Casa Vieja Press: Pacific Palisades, CA, 1997, 182pp., 1940s

     "During the forties, volleyball superseded surfing as the top State Beach sport and a whole new hierarcy fought for the honors . . . The sport of beach volleyball had its beginnings in the 1920s on a public court near Santa Monica pier and on courts at the various beach clubs. In the 1930s, two of the best public court players, Manny Saenz and Bernie Holtzman, supplemented their sparse earnings b playing the various club teams for small wagers . . . They both moved on to the court at State Beach, where competition was more intense . . .

     " . . ." p. 123

     "204-219 Chautauqua . . . a five-acre meadow between Chautauqua and Corona del Mar is significant In the early 1900s it was owned by Robert Gillis and accommodated several shacks, one used by his daughter, Adelaide's, mandolin teacher, . . .

     "In 1932 the property was purchased by Will Rogers and held by the Rogers family until 1945, when it was acquired by John Entenza, publisher of Arts and Architecture magazine, for his Case Study Program. The plan featured houses of modern design, often steel-framed and utilizing low-cost elements in their construction. Today . . . four of these landmark structures, built from 1946-49, still occupy the original site. . . .

     " . . . The Eames* house, designed by Charles Eames* and his wife, Ray*, is the best preserved in its natural setting and is notable for interior elements designed by Charles* and Ray Eames*. Both the Eames house and the nearby Entenza are on the list of Los Angeles Cultural Heritage landmarks."

     "477 Upper Mesa . . . Architect Thornton Abell purchased a portion of the Kyte garden in 1937 and in 1942 built a small house on the property. Its first tenant was artist Richard Haines and his wife, Nona. who were on their way to Alaska to fulfill a contract for a mural when World War II intervened and the couple were stranded. . . . After seven years [1949] the couple moved to Amalfi. . . ."

 

 

(Back to Sources)